True security is built upon the natural emergence of human-computer interaction. Any formal security has its deterministic assumptions, such as the security assumption of blockchain technology based on Code Is Law. But it doesn't go into who updates and manages the code. If we only focus on Code is Law, then we will inevitably expose the security of blockchain to the hands of developers (who deploy and update Code controls it). This is also a common problem with Eth bringing formal blockchain technology. Not only have EVM smart contracts caused various security disasters due to developers' intentional or unintentional actions. And no matter how many formal security audits are conducted, these security disasters will not solve the problem. Security issues do not arise from the audited code. But it comes from the deployed updated code. The centralization or security vulnerability of Code is Law lies in who develops and manages the Code. Bitcoin, on the other hand, deploys and agrees to update code through miners in a distributed manner, avoiding the problem of developer centralization. The technical scope of Bitcoin has far exceeded the formal code is law. Code is Law is only the initial condition for Bitcoin, and the entire Bitcoin network is a network that gradually grows and generates value through the participation of community human individuals in the game based on the initial conditions of Code is Law. And this process has gone from disorder to order, reflecting the emergence principle of Darwin's theory of evolution of harmonious coexistence and progress between humans and nature.