Principles and Questions of MagicEden Compensation Scheme I. Scalability (Mobility) We hope that by actively participating, users can receive more airdrop rewards, rather than allowing early users who held a large number of airdrops to accumulate advantages through staking. Our goal is to create fair opportunities for users with fewer resources to also receive substantial returns through active participation Related questions: Why was no detailed explanation provided when the pledge mechanism was launched? That's because if we had said from the beginning that pledging without trading would not yield returns, then there wouldn't have been so many people pledging. What is the specific definition and meaning of 'pledge' in this context? Do all ME tokens need to be obtained through purchase? Is there a situation of high-level transfer? II. Preventing witch attacks and unnatural trading (Sybil&Inorganic Trading) We are committed to preventing witch attackers and non natural traders from obtaining large amounts of airdrops or compensation. Since the launch of the project (TGE), we have been continuously cracking down on such behavior by identifying and redistributing rewards to ensure that real users benefit. We believe that MagicEden has an industry-leading witch attack detection mechanism Related questions: Is the platform aware of the scale of non natural transactions within the platform? Why not only tacitly approve, but also assist the project party in brushing transactions? Did the witch attacker not participate in the transaction at all? Do transactions require payment of transaction fees? Do these transaction fees belong to the platform? Is this principle truly aimed at preventing witch attacks or providing an opportunity to create a 'rat den'? III. Staying True to Our Communications MagicEden is committed to adhering to the principles of communication with the community, ensuring transparency and fairness. “ Related doubts: The so-called 'keeping promises' has not been fulfilled by MagicEden. The platform has been accused of betraying the community, staking users, and trading users, diluting the value of ME tokens, prioritizing its own "mouse warehouse" for profit, and harming the interests of all token holders. Rules were established, but additional rules were added midway, which stuck the pledgers, The total amount of airdrops is fixed So, may I ask, who profited from the additional rules? That must be Magiceden's own mouse den.