I really didn't want to curse at you, I couldn't help it anymore, I just had some bad writing skills. The ERC6909 protocol is a great thing. We argue every day, can't we buy anything else after buying ZAMM? Can't the others do it? Did you set rules for users to ride horses? Firstly, ZAMM is a leader that even fools know. With the increase in traffic, there will naturally be funds coming in. Secondly, as long as the user is willing, they can buy whatever they want. One protocol prospers, but do they have to buy one? They want to build sats, but you still won't let them? Can't I buy Stas if I buy ORDI? Thirdly, each user has a different amount of funds and thinking, and now the most important thing is to spread and make mainstream wallets support the protocol as soon as possible. Some users only have 50U, and if you insist on them buying zamm and building it with you, will they? What profits and multiples does he have? What is the motivation? If he gets a Dragon 2, he will have higher space, motivation to spread the protocol on Twitter, to leave comments on Twitter, and motivation to spread, because his position is different and his profit is different. Fourthly, if the so-called 'Dragon Two Dragon Three' continues to prosper, looking back, does ZAMM have higher traffic? Retail investors are not FOMO, you're playing with your mud horse. The agreement still needs to be disseminated by individual investors to gain support from mainstream wallets. Every day, there are one dragon and eight dragons, with a heavy brush. Anyone with a bit of logical thinking knows how to make this protocol prosper, without users fomo or spreading it, how can it develop rapidly? He only has 50U, he wants to eat 50 times more. If you insist on him buying ZAMM, will he build with you, tweet, and spread new things? Mud horse comparison, daily internal strife. I couldn't help but write a long article. Everyone thought you were just riding horses and pretending to be smart.