We are currently considering an issue titled 'Sorting out the token economics of these web2 project parties on believe'. The product may provide empowerment for tokens in several situations, including: -In the worst case, there is no empowerment. After issuing coins, there is no empowerment, only real world attention. After a wave of speculation, there is no empowerment anymore, and some even delete their posts and run away -Official website, founder posts CA, but without empowerment -Accept token payments, such as @ ehalm_, which has already accepted yapper payments and has expectations of burning, locking, or reinvestment -Accept token payments and provide discounted prices to users who use token payments -Internal circulation within the economic system related to token embedding within the product -Distributing product revenue dividends to cryptocurrency investors, as done by the gambling platform @ rollbit (although not on Believe, it can be used as a case reference) I also questioned this question a long time ago, and there are three answers: 1. Can make him earn more 2. Can attract more attention 3. Faster path for investors to exit (the threshold for web2 to exit IPO is higher) At present, it is still in the first and second stages without much empowerment