I have previously made a similar suggestion to OKX, but @ Mercy_okx raised a question that OKX Wallet and OKX Exchange are two independent entities operating separately, and there is no connection between the two But actually, I think even so, it doesn't matter. In the process of listing DD, you always need to look at user data. So where does user data occur? Is it not user data? Considering the addition of new users to the exchange is already an important part of the coin listing assessment, and the two are not contradictory Secondly, for a project that is listed on Binance/OKX/Bybit, a budget must be allocated to the exchange for activities (after confirming the listing), and a budget needs to be allocated to the chain to exchange data for submission to the exchange for review before being listed on the exchange The Binance Wallet, which comes with its own user KYC portal, combined with the Binance Alpha coin listing channel, allows for the merging of two budgets into one. The on chain users, namely Binance exchange users, also directly take over the distribution rights of the first level airdrop, ensuring that their users will definitely receive benefits. Why can't OKX wallet do this? Isn't it enough to bind an exchange KYC with an on chain address? All project parties can allocate the OKX coin listing activity share from the first day, and require users to join the OKX wallet KYC identity to participate in the airdrop in order to potentially obtain the share. If you don't make it to OKX in the end, you can give less of this part It is only a matter of time before blockchain interactive airdrops that do not point to exchanges exit the historical stage. Exchanges like OKX, which have a dominant market position, should be even more aware of this, otherwise it will be all for the benefit of friendly merchants