Speaking of the value of new neutral assets, it seems that they have not been fully digested by the market yet. Many people think that neutral assets are nothing special. They may seem the least passionate and plain, but they are the most enduring. It's not like memecoins that rely on certain big shots. Once the big shots lose their position (it's only a matter of time before any big shot returns to mediocrity), these memecoins will eventually disappear. If short-term speculation is not a problem, but holding for the long term, it is also possible to think about it in peace. So, the question is, what type of asset is a neutral asset? Large companies like Apple and Tesla are not entirely considered neutral assets, but rather linked to a country. True neutral assets do not rely on any entity (country, company, organization, etc.), and typical neutral assets include gold, BTC, and ETH. This is also the importance of these assets maintaining neutrality, rather than relying on certain forces like some tokens, such as some public chains claiming to be their own concept coins. The advantage is that it can stimulate the market's nerves and emotions, but the disadvantage is, do you really believe in such public chains and assets? Do you really dare to hold it for the long term? In human history, neutral assets are few and far between, and it is not by chance that gold can last for thousands of years. Neutral assets are rare and valuable. The old neutral asset is gold, while the new neutral assets in the digital age are currently only BTC and ETH. Neutral assets have long-term nature, but short-term speculation is another matter.