To be honest, ETH, SOL, and BTC all handle security incidents in the same way. The decentralization we pursue should not be at the expense of innocent people's property. The vulnerabilities themselves are technical design flaws, not failures of blockchain consensus mechanisms. In 2016, Ethereum rolled back The DAO attack through a hard fork, rescuing ETH worth $60 million at the time (3.6 million ETH, worth $10 billion at current prices). Solana experienced multiple shutdowns - September 2021, May 2022, February 2023 Bitcoin has rolled back a 2010 vulnerability that created 184 billion BTC. Yes - billions, that BTC no longer exists. But when SUI used a protection mechanism to freeze $160 million in stolen funds, which were frozen by the verification node and suspended from protecting user assets, it was questioned by many people as "centralized! Scammer The key is not whether centralized technology is adopted, but whether these mechanisms are transparent and controllable, and whether they comply with community consensus. If you understand decentralization as' allowing hackers to freely withdraw funds and run away ', then BTC and ETH no longer exist, and your assets cannot be protected and can be plundered. This is not decentralization but anarchism.