Analysis: How did Sui officially freeze $160 million for hackers? 》The verifier ignores transactions with hacker addresses directly during the mempool stage. These transactions are technically completely effective, but they won't be packaged and put on the chain for you. The hacker's funds are thus' confined 'in the address. Although hackers control a large amount of assets in the address, in order to transfer these USDC, SUI, etc., they must initiate a transaction and be packaged and confirmed by the verifier. The verifier holds the power of life and death, and if the verifier refuses to package, the object can never be moved. In addition to temporary coordination by validators, Sui may have pre-set a rejection list function at the system level. Sui officials also stated that they will return frozen funds to the pool, but if the verifier really refuses to package the transaction, theoretically these funds should never be moved. How did Sui achieve the return? This further challenges the decentralized nature of the Sui chain. read the whole passage: https://www. (wublock123.com)/index.php? m=content&c=index&a=show&catid=47&id=42904