Next steps for Virtuals: Plan 69 The '69 Plan' is a new token launch model aimed at balancing founder commitment and community trust through a 69 day experimental window. 69 day experimental window: After the project party releases tokens on the Genesis platform, it enters a 69 day testing period to collect market feedback (trading volume, community participation, etc.) and verify the product's market fit. Dual track result design: Continuing to operate: If the team chooses to continue operating, they will receive pre allocated team tokens and accumulated transaction fees. Suspension of project: If the expected outcome is not met, the LP will be automatically liquidated, and funds will be returned to token holders in proportion. Trading fees will be distributed according to the holding ratio. Anti abuse mechanism: The founder needs to publicly disclose their identity and articulate the project vision through a Loom video. It feels like a very interesting gameplay, suitable for very early projects, allowing founders and teams to test real market feedback at a small exit cost in the early stages, while the community is also expected to receive substantial returns by supporting projects in the early stages. Another thing is that I participated in AIN update this morning and currently have a 10x floating profit. Currently, there is a serious homogenization problem in the Virtuals Genesis launch project. Here are some features/directions I suggest adding: 1. Integration with high-quality centralized exchanges. At present, the ceiling FDV for projects launched by Virtuals is around 20 million US dollars. There are many reasons, firstly, Virtuals itself is tailor-made for small and medium-sized AI projects, focusing on small but refined; Next is the Virtuals system, which covers various aspects such as token launch, liquidity management, and marketing promotion. However, the last link, cex, is still lacking. Currently, a massive number of users and funds are still retained in cex. Only by connecting this link can the valuation be improved. 2/Currently, some of the incentivized Virtuals are doing well, but there is a lack of information disclosure and punishment. For example, I have seen some projects with blemishes in the past that have already issued tokens, transforming themselves into AI narratives and then issuing another coin. meaningless. At the very least, turn on the comment function to allow the community to comment on new projects being developed, rather than searching for content on social media themselves. Alternatively, a stain disclosure database can be introduced to integrate on chain data with X platform intelligence, establish a project team history query tool, and reduce information asymmetry. It's quite tiring, write wherever you want. Continue to delve deeper into @ virtualis_io!