After the stablecoin bill, the underlying assets of compliant stablecoins were restricted to US bonds, and everyone's focus shifted to distribution. Payment and RWA scenarios are undoubtedly the most suitable for this type of stablecoin. But the difficulty in this type of profit side lies in how to provide a decentralized on-demand experience similar to Defi, while maintaining a high rate of return. This requires a high level of ability for the team to find assets and control risks. Huma has already proven itself in the first 100M of use. The reserve of stablecoins has increased from 200B to 250B within six months, and most of the money entering the market comes from the traditional world. Currently, it is mainly used in payment and other scenarios, and we will definitely seek profits on the chain in the future. High quality revenue players like Huma will successfully pursue their targets. On the other hand, for stablecoin project parties, finding high-quality distribution channels has become a top priority. The role of the token is to give Bribe a higher voice, and both groups of people are potential buyers of Huma tokens. These days, there are actual businesses and potential B-end buying opportunities, with visible growth. It's difficult to find targets for people with a community foundation