Charts
DataOn-chain
VIP
Market Cap
API
Rankings
CoinOSNew
CoinClaw🦞
Language
  • 简体中文
  • 繁体中文
  • English
Leader in global market data applications, committed to providing valuable information more efficiently.

Features

  • Real-time Data
  • Special Features
  • AI Grid

Services

  • News
  • Open Data(API)
  • Institutional Services

Downloads

  • Desktop
  • Android
  • iOS

Contact Us

  • Chat Room
  • Business Email
  • Official Email
  • Official Verification

Join Community

  • Telegram
  • Twitter
  • Discord

© Copyright 2013-2026. All rights reserved.

简体繁體English
|Legacy
BTCBTC
💲72521.62
+
1.8%
ETHETH
💲2177.57
+
4.03%
SOLSOL
💲91.58
+
3.94%
USDCUSDC
💲1.00
+
0.03%
XRPXRP
💲1.44
+
2.13%
TRUMPTRUMP
💲4.06
+
0.25%

Analysis: A single KOGE transaction was caught at $47000, and a user set a sliding point of nearly 50% without activating MEV protection

律动BlockBeats
律动BlockBeats|6月 08, 2025 06:07
According to BlockBeats news, on June 8th, according to X user @ litangsongyx's analysis, the reason for the user's loss of $47000 in a single KOGE/USDT transaction this morning was due to setting a sliding point of nearly 50% and not activating MEV protection. The user had a single transaction volume of $210000 and ultimately received a KOGE worth $161000, resulting in a loss of $47000. Due to the huge transaction volume of the user, the router has split their transactions into three liquidity pools: Using Uniswap V4 liquidity pool with a trading volume of $120000; $43000 trading volume using Uniswap V3 liquidity pool with tail number E507; $47000 trading volume using PancakeSwap liquidity pool with tail number 7057; When trading through the PancakeSwap liquidity pool with tail number 7057, the MEV robot used a $320000 transaction to push KOGE to a very high level, causing the user to complete the transaction at a very high transaction price. The PancakeSwap liquidity pool has not encountered any issues. The liquidity pool is only responsible for redemption, and the determination of slippage is left to order routing. The 'from Token Amount' parameter indicates that the user wants to exchange $214838 for KOGE, while the 'minReturnAmount' parameter indicates that the minimum quantity of KOGE the user wants to receive is 1640. However, 2547 KOGE were actually received, and the order routing was not incorrect. The problem lies in setting the sliding point too high. At that time, $214838 could be exchanged for approximately 3300 KOGE. As the minimum received quantity was set to 1640, it can be inferred that the user's sliding point setting was as high as nearly 50%, and MEV protection was not enabled. The user has added KOGE tokens to the ZKJ-KOGE liquidity pool to earn fees after the MEV attack.
+5
Mentioned
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Timeline

7月 08, 03:38【Meme market performance is poor】
7月 08, 02:32【Bonk data is great, it's still in the explosive stage】
7月 08, 00:51【Transfer 3631 ETH from Whale/Institution Address】
7月 08, 00:35【Giant Whale redeems 95313 ETH and enters CEX, losing over $40 million】
7月 07, 18:00【Jade Card launches sub card function to achieve flexible expenditure management】
7月 07, 15:36【Make a good breakthrough】
7月 07, 14:52【OK risk control system upgrade attracts user attention】
7月 07, 12:00【The transaction volume in June was 124.3 billion yuan】
7月 07, 11:30【PEPE trading pair launched on Poloniex platform】
7月 07, 11:21【Ancient Whale Moves 80000 BTC to Impact Link】

HotFlash

|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

APP
Windows
Mac

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Hot Reads