😂 In fact, many macro and information transactions are like this, whether it's CPI, geopolitical conflicts, or even the argument between Sichuan and Malaysia, they are all part of the information aspect. Whether the information aspect affects the short or long term depends on the sustainability of the information. For this geopolitical conflict, I am not placing an order because it is clearly not over yet (although I mistakenly thought it was Saturday). At this time, the future trend is still unknown. If it stalls like this, I will play a game of rebound later. If the conflict worsens, I may adjust the amount of the pending order. I don't think there's a problem with looking for good news when it rises and bad news when it falls. If you don't know the reasons for the good and bad news, it's difficult for someone like me who doesn't know how to judge the technical aspect, and even the entry and exit times. For example, if you go long at $101000, you estimate that Chuanma's verbal battle won't last long. But if you don't know it's because of the argument, do you dare to take action in the face of such a rapid decline? In addition, on April 10, Trump also announced a 90 day suspension of tariffs on other countries except China, so the market sentiment was reversed. So I think the essence of trading is to find one's own judgment basis, and to make money based on this basis. There is no right or wrong, just like many friends say that this decline is purely an increase, and the banker wants to cut a profit. I don't object to this. If you think it's right, then that's it. This tweet is sponsored by @ ApeXProtocolCN | Dex With Apex