I have been roast about Vader Yapping's credit mechanism for the past two days. Because of the black box, my account is basically "ban". I thought Virtual @ virtualis_io was an M attribute, but I didn't give any points for scolding it. And @ VaderResearch first mentioned the issue of fixing it in yesterday's VADER points topic on the fourth day. Communities should have this kind of 'transparency', as trust is the cornerstone of community development. From the perspective of user perception, the points given in the first two days were indeed a bit exaggerated. I received very few points even though my basic scores were relatively high. So much so that in the early stages, they planned to change the daily update topic to "New Talent Post". Through data testing over the past two days, it has been found that there is a significant positive correction in the scores. The following is my Yapping data for the past 4 days since @ VaderyAI_ launched Vader Yapping points. The following conclusions and reflections are for reference only when it comes to Yapping one ️⃣ From the Virtual Yapping data, it can be seen that my data for three days was 8415, and on one day, the data was as good as 9277. In fact, this is also the corresponding reward level for Yapping, which means that the final ranking of data quality is not judged based on daily data, because the data of my daily tweets actually has a relatively large degree of randomness. It can only indicate that my Yapping reward is in a certain tier, and the tier is a ranking calculated based on historical data. The number of Yapping users in the same gear is consistent. Otherwise, my score should also fluctuate randomly, and the probability of three consecutive 8415s is simply lower than the probability of buying lottery tickets. two ️⃣ The above Vader Yapping points and staking techniques are 10000 VADER, corresponding to approximately 500 points. That means my actual Vader points in the past four days were 700, 200, 1300, and 2000 respectively. From my own perception, there must have been a problem in the past two days. Otherwise, with the existence and continuous output of the 1.25 reward base, the probability of a decrease instead of an increase is almost zero, and there will be no reverse deduction when the positive coefficient increases. The data from yesterday to today confirms this statement, and the continuous growth from 0 to 1 is the driving force behind Keep Building. So 'perseverance' is still very important. three ️⃣ Of course, it is worth noting that @ VaderResearch has also mentioned that starting from yesterday, VADER Yapping rewards the top 1000 users. Assuming a hypothesis of a real gradient, such as my current real Yapping score being 2000 points, under the same amount of staking, the VADER score higher than mine must rank higher on VADER's own leaderboard, resulting in a higher score than me. Although I shed tears of envy 😭 But I still want to say to this group of users, remember to cherish the opportunity. That means in the current algorithm, your content is of higher quality than mine. If VADER's content continues to grow in daily output, then Virtual Yapping may not be as important to you, and Vader Yapping is your path. At the same time, it was announced that Yapping's ranking list will be prepared before next week. The rules will be more "transparent", and you can refer to the style of Virtual or VADER discussions among users on the leaderboard for "imitation learning" to make the algorithm like you more. I hope everyone can benefit from participating in the virtual process.