Looking at it, there are some noteworthy aspects of the ecological strategy adopted by @ Lumenetworks after its main website was launched: 1) The two wheel drive strategy of RWA DEX+revenue aggregator is very clever. @RoosterProtocol specializes in the RWAFI track, and the AMM architecture based on MAV Protocol can provide more accurate liquidity control. The ve (3,3) model is also the mainstream gameplay for DeFi revenue optimization at present. 5M TVL with 34.8M monthly trading volume, this turnover rate is quite impressive, indicating good efficiency in capital utilization. 2) The design of the "two-layer amplifier" @ roycoprotocol is a bit interesting. Let the user first mine YAP on Rooster (the credential token obtained by depositing nALPHA+pUSD into the liquidity pool), and then throw YAP into Royco to continue mining PLUME, which is equivalent to stacking the yield of the same fund twice. The TVL of 34.3M also confirms the market's recognition of this gameplay. This "nested" profit strategy essentially uses PLUME's inflation rewards to cold start the entire DeFi ecosystem, and enhances user stickiness through multiple incentive mechanisms. Note: This is an officially supported revenue aggregator. Although the RWA track is still in its early stages, it is indeed a necessary path for traditional finance to migrate to the blockchain. The key now is to build sufficient application scenarios at the RWA infrastructure level, and the first step is to have sustained revenue mining attractiveness. However, relying on the nested doll model to maintain a lively ecosystem of "digging, selling, and reselling" poses significant challenges to the price stability of the main token. Compared to other mature DeFi protocols, the Plume ecosystem is still a newborn and requires more time to verify.