Correspondence between trading ability and cost Taking the recent @ SaharaLabsAI as an example, my cost advantage was already quite good, with a 0.06 new order and selling it directly upon opening. I just saw that everyone was shaking, and then I felt that the price had dropped almost, so I could buy at the bottom and start buying. I only found out afterwards that I was the only one who bought with real money and belonged to the Water Corps, while many people were shouting orders from Guangzi 😭。 In the end, it became like, I believed the story, I bought it, they made up the story, they took the advertising fee and chose to sell it, and then we both got our own things 😮 ‍ 💨。 Fortunately, I took the opportunity to cut my losses and sold the remaining SAHARA at the lowest point. Many people in China-Chic Group are also saying, can you tell whether you are really optimistic or advertising? In fact, it doesn't matter. Only when you buy, you will be optimistic. After all, you are responsible for your own position 😭。 In the future, the exchange will play less of these games. Recently, the exchange has been making money on the chain and hasn't taken any points home. The most important thing is that the costs do not correspond, and the transaction methods are also inconsistent. You cannot let 0 and 1 compete against each other. This circle is still suitable for the gameplay of small to big. The trading system mentioned by Mr. Wu is indeed being honed early on. Anyway, I still don't have a system and I'm just playing xjb. My reason for opening long and short is still stuck at: I want to open. And on the chain, it has become: I like it. So it is indeed only suitable for the "rolling dice" gameplay, as hitting one will cover other costs. Go to sleep, good night everyone.