Last night, I initially guessed that it was @ hypereion_xyz, but after thinking about it, it was unlikely, so I deleted it. Then I turned around and guessed about the volcano and town As a result, the volcano crater experienced alpha, and @ hyperion-xyz really engaged in this TGE activity with @ four_mame_ .. Actually, my emotions towards the @ Aptos chain are quite complex. On the one hand, Da Mao is extremely simple. The first time I learned how to use multiple accounts to do so was when I encountered Apt. With an NFT from a testing website, I could sell 1500u. I still remember getting up in the morning to sell coins, and the feeling of selling 10000 RMB per account was so satisfying On the other hand, the ecology on the APT chain is always peculiar. Many people, including myself, were cut off from the APT domain and NFT back then. All kinds of projects are either running away or dead. (Hot knowledge: At that time, you could buy 2.5 BTC for less than 50000 RMB...) Looking back at @ hypereion_xyz. I previously received official investments from OKX and APT, but this time I have also joined the TGE of BN and @ four_ceme_. In fact, from the perspective of product track and nature, if we compare the ecosystem on @ SuiNetwork, it should be @ CetuSProtocol. After all, looking at the tvl list on APT, since its launch on the mainnet in February 25, this thing has become the number one dex tvl on the chain in just five months. According to the previously announced token information: The total amount of tokens is 100 million, the airdrop share is 5%, and the initial circulation is about 20%, which is about 2kw; Currently, Cetus' FDV looks like it's at 120m So the problem is, if we really go online against Cetus, then @ hyperion-xyz should not be less than 100m, blindly guessing. Next, we will wait for the official details of the bonding curve to be released. I don't know how much the first line is this time ..