Charts
DataOn-chain
VIP
Market Cap
API
Rankings
CoinOSNew
CoinClaw🦞
Language
  • 简体中文
  • 繁体中文
  • English
Leader in global market data applications, committed to providing valuable information more efficiently.

Features

  • Real-time Data
  • Special Features
  • AI Grid

Services

  • News
  • Open Data(API)
  • Institutional Services

Downloads

  • Desktop
  • Android
  • iOS

Contact Us

  • Chat Room
  • Business Email
  • Official Email
  • Official Verification

Join Community

  • Telegram
  • Twitter
  • Discord

© Copyright 2013-2026. All rights reserved.

简体繁體English
|Legacy
BTCBTC
💲70702.55
-
1.42%
ETHETH
💲2075.73
-
1.15%
SOLSOL
💲87.20
-
2.08%
TRUMPTRUMP
💲3.95
+
6.18%
USDCUSDC
💲0.9999
+
0.01%
DOGEDOGE
💲0.09444
-
3.24%

陈剑Jason
陈剑Jason|Jul 17, 2025 12:53
Yesterday at the Base press conference, it was announced that the use of Flashblocks technology has improved performance by 10 times, and transactions can be completed in just 200 milliseconds. A friend asked me how this is achieved. Just now, I looked at the documentation and found that the core is to use a pre confirmation scheme similar to Base Rollup, which divides the original block into ten sub blocks and places them one by one according to the order of transaction initiation. Every time a sub block is filled, the transactions in that sub block are internally pre confirmed as valid. After saving enough 10 sub blocks, it is packaged into a normal block for broadcast. Because it is divided into 10 sub blocks, the performance is also improved by 10 times. You will definitely ask a question, isn't this the difference in block size that existed a long time ago? Yes, logically it is like this, but the biggest difference is that these sub blocks are not actually true blocks, they are just confirmed internally without real consensus and block generation, so it is called pre confirmation. So this process also brings a risk and a benefit. The risk is that it is an internal pre confirmation and has not completed the normal block production, so there may be a risk of invalid transactions. This completely depends on the reliability of the nodes. However, to be honest, these L2 are all centralized with only a few nodes, but the degree of centralization has been increased from 99% to 99.9%, so the problem is not significant. Another advantage is that this approach is equivalent to ending MEV, as there is no longer a process of block sorting. Instead, transactions are pushed to sub blocks for confirmation in chronological order of their initiation, and then packaged into a block for broadcasting. Therefore, all transactions on the chain are in chronological order, and there are no tips or clips involved. So currently, adopting pre confirmation for the entire L2 is a big trend, and it is estimated that other chains will follow suit in the future.
+5
Mentioned
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Timeline

Aug 16, 00:39ChatGPT creates a personal trading execution manual
Aug 15, 13:40ICYMI enters decentralized trading through Orbs Network
Aug 15, 11:30Reeve provides verifiable on chain records
Aug 14, 14:40They are building a super high-speed railway
Aug 13, 16:15【The difference between atomic exchange and bridging】
Aug 13, 02:25【AiCoin Professional Data API Engine Officially Opened】
Aug 12, 10:06【Monero network suspected of experiencing a 51% attack】
Aug 12, 07:34【The Application and Advantages of BOLL Indicator in the Coin Industry】
Aug 11, 22:12【The benefits of creating an LP pool between two diff tokens】
Aug 11, 13:33【PortaltoBitcoin eliminates bridge risks】

HotFlash

|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

APP
Windows
Mac

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Hot Reads