Don't believe it, go verify it. Infrared conducted an experiment to compare the operational performance of iBERA validation scheme with independent validators based on different scenarios. Let's start with the conclusion: IBERA wins in high to medium cost operating scenarios. Especially when the infrastructure cost exceeds $2500 per month, the advantage is particularly evident; In the scenario of large-scale pledging (pledging over 10 million BERAs), independent validators emerge victorious, demonstrating higher competitive returns. Science popularization (in case readers are unaware of the background): iBERA is a bear chain liquidity staking scheme launched by Infrared. Users can obtain iBERA by staking BERA, which not only maintains token liquidity (which can be widely applied and integrated in DeFi), but also earns staking rewards. Given that independent validators require a significant investment of funds and time, as well as a high level of technical expertise, in the vast majority of scenarios, iBERA verification schemes outperform independent validators. The advantages mainly come from the following aspects: Higher treasury incentive capture efficiency: iBERA dynamically optimizes BGT reward allocation through automated systems, while independent validators are limited by a single strategy Dynamic BGT strategy optimization: iBERA flexibly switches between boost and heavy bet strategies based on real-time network conditions, and independent validators need to make manual decisions, which is inefficient Eliminating infrastructure costs: Independent validators need to bear a monthly operating expense of $1000-5000, while iBERA users do not need to bear this cost The top spot in the bear chain ecosystem, where Infrared sits steadily.