I was lying in bed, originally just wanting to casually ask AI: "Are there any in-depth articles recommended for blockchain governance recently? ” AI quickly threw me a string of results: beautiful title, sharp viewpoint, well summarized, even helped me mark the key points. I was quite touched at the time and thought to myself: Isn't this too convenient! When I reached the third post, I suddenly felt something was wrong—— The viewpoints of these articles are surprisingly consistent: Either 'decentralization changes the world' or 'public chain governance is a joke'. Either it's all dreams, or it's all criticism. What about the analysis with data and debate in between? Not a single one. My heart skipped a beat. This thing is not "helping me find information", it is "helping me choose my stance". So I asked the AI another question, trying to find a different voice. What was the result? AI still politely 'optimized' my needs and pushed me the same tune. At that moment, I suddenly thought of the viewpoint mentioned by @ MiraN_Network: The bias of AI is more terrifying than its illusions. The illusion can at least be exposed, and upon inspection, it is clear that it is wrong. What about prejudice? It's like boiling a frog in warm water, slowly "seasoning" your information world, and you don't even feel anything is wrong. By the time you discover it, you will have long been accustomed to the 'single world' modified by AI. So I'm really scared now: AI is not helping me save time, but gradually rewriting the way I understand the world. And this is also why @ MiraN_Network is so popular on @ KaitoAI's list: It's not about AI writing a few wrong words, but how AI gradually "shapes" the window through which we see the world @ Arbitrum @ Aptos @ 0xPolygon @ shoutdotfun ENERGY