Come on, come on, the kissing is over too. I'm sure I won't be able to get the publicity fee Let's talk about @ SuccinchLabs, also known as Prove, from an objective perspective Being a witch this time really saved at least 10000 u! Pure lying gun, really unlucky. However, the project performance is still good! Unlike traditional L2 networks, the purpose is to expand the network performance of ETH Succinct is more like a zk infrastructure middleware We originally knew that zk was the famous zero knowledge proof, and we wanted to create a zk swap, zk lending, zk network, and so on. We need to hire a high paying CTO with a background in cryptography to start developing from scratch. The development cost is extremely high, and the prospects for application scenarios are unknown. Succinct is a ZK infrastructure or notary office. No matter what ZK application you want to develop, just go ahead and develop it boldly. Integrate the succinct API and he will help you with the zk part. From the test cases on the testnet, there is some room for imagination. And in the economic model, every time succinct is called for zk proof, a fee is required. This is a real profit with commercial prospects. The mortgage providers on the succinct network are all decentralized notaries. This way, the token mortgagor has the income from participating in notarization and the income from the prove itself, which is a good story. But.. But it's here At present, the project is developing too quickly, and the market for this integration requirement has not yet opened up. I haven't seen the portion of notarized income and real income at the moment. And even with the income from the 'notarization', how much of this money will be given to the team, how much will be given to the nodes, and how much will be used to repurchase the coin price? Everything is still unknown So overall, I think the short-term benefits of Prove are about the same, and the annualized pledge is relatively ordinary. The future market has great prospects. If the large-scale landing of blockchain applications or the emergence of exchange level zk users, there will inevitably be an explosion After the simultaneous outbreak, will the team benefit, the nodes benefit, or the holders benefit. It depends on the team structure in the final economic model design. It's already a great business. If we don't support the ecosystem with the capital bureau and accelerate the development of the zk application ecosystem, it doesn't make a difference whether we issue coins or not. The money has already been put into the pocket, which is the beginning of testing the team's structure.