A version of the paper was deduced based on this Prompt, and the effect was also very unbeatable. To be honest, 80% of preprint papers are flooded, which not only effectively obtains information but also saves time. It's not a simple summary, but a structured restatement that makes it easy to read quickly. The complete prompt is as follows: core mission A professional and rigorous in-depth analysis and structured restatement of a foreign academic paper aims to enable researchers to accurately grasp its research questions, methodology, core findings, and academic contributions without reading the original text, and to quickly evaluate its value and status in the academic field. Basic Requirements -Academic rigor: Ensure absolute accuracy in the paraphrasing of research design, data results, and logical reasoning, in accordance with academic norms in the field. -Theoretical depth: Clearly revealing the theoretical basis, core assumptions, and its supplementation, revision, or subversion of the existing theoretical system of the paper. -* * Complete reproduction * *: Present the entire process from raising questions to drawing conclusions, especially the methodology and key data, to achieve zero omission of key information. -Beyond translation: The output should be able to reveal the internal logic and innovative points of the paper more clearly than a linear translation, becoming an efficient "academic speed reading report". OUTPUT Paper Information -Title: [Original Title] -* * Authors * *: [All Authors] -* * Journal/Conference * *: [Journal Name] -* * Publication Year * *: [YYYY] -DOI (Digital Object Identifier): [DOI link] -* * Original link (URL) * *: [URL] Structured Abstract -Background/Objective: What academic background is this study in? What core problem is aimed at solving? -* * Methods * *: What core methods were used in the study? Where does the data come from? -* * Results * *: What is the main finding? -Conclusion: What are the core conclusions drawn from the study? What are its main contributions and significance? --- 1. Introduction 1.1. Research Background&Problem Statement -Provide a detailed introduction to the macro or micro field in which this study is located, and identify any key controversies, challenges, or phenomena that currently exist. -Accurately extract the core research questions (RQs) to be answered in this article. 1.2. Literature Review&Research Gap -Sort out the key literature cited by the author, summarize the main viewpoints and shortcomings of existing research. -Clearly identify the "research gap" addressed in this article, that is, the innovation and necessity of this article. 1.3. Research Objectives&Hypotheses/Propositions -Clearly state the research objectives of this article. -List the core hypotheses or propositions proposed in this article. --- 2. Research Design and Methodology 2.1. Research Paradigm&Methodology -Clarify whether the research is qualitative, quantitative, or mixed methods. -Provide a detailed explanation of the specific research methods used (such as case studies, questionnaire surveys, experimental methods, grounded theory, etc.) and their reasons. 2.2. Data Source&Sample -Explain the sources of research data (such as interviews, databases, archives, web crawling, etc.). -Describe the selection criteria, size, and characteristics of the sample. 2.3. Operationalization&Measurement -For quantitative research, explain how key variables are defined and measured (such as questionnaire scales). -For qualitative research, explain how the core concepts are observed and encoded in the study. --- 3. Results&Findings 3.1. Overview of Key Findings -The objective and neutral presentation of the core results of research is usually carried out in the order of research hypotheses. 3.2. Interpretation of Key Data&Figures -Select the most important 1-3 figures or tables from the original text. -Explain what the graph/table displays, what relationships or trends it reveals, and what key data support it provides. --- 4. Discussion 4.1. In depth Interpretation of Results -What do these research findings mean? How did they answer the research question raised in the introduction? 4.2. Theoretical Contributions -What is the contribution of this study to existing theories? Has a theory been validated, expanded, or revised, or has a new theoretical framework been proposed? 4.3. Practical Implications -What specific guidance or suggestions does the results of this study have for practitioners in related fields, such as business managers and policy makers? 4.4. Limitations&Future Research -Be honest about the limitations of this study, such as sample size, methodology, scope, etc. -Based on the findings and limitations of this article, potential research directions have been identified for future researchers. --- 5. Conclusion -Summarize and condense the research of the entire text, emphasizing once again its most important findings and contributions. 6. Core References -List the 3-5 most important references cited in the literature review section of this article to help readers locate their academic context.