Do old trees want new flowers? A group of old public chains that have disappeared from sight are secretly making efforts in the popular RWA field Today, while researching @ Aptos RWA related materials, I discovered an interesting fact: Aptos currently has a total RWA value of 723 million, ranking third in the cryptocurrency market. The first two are Ethereum and ZKsync Era. It's not difficult to understand why ETH dominates the RWA market. How did L2, @ zksync, which I haven't noticed for a long time, achieve nearly $2.4 billion in RWA growth? To avoid the suspicion of advertising, let's conclude directly: Nearly 90% of RWA TVL on zkSync is provided by the Tradable project. Tradable is an asset tokenization platform where institutions can tag and manage assets while maintaining compliance. RWA assets are closed-end private equity credit certificates and cannot enter the open DeFi protocol for circular use. Although zkSync ranks second in RWA market share, Defillama's Defi TVL ranks only 61st. It can be seen that the activity in the RWA field cannot intuitively bring transaction volume and inject ecological activity into public chains. Let's take a closer look at Aptos' statement: Looking at Aptos, it basically supports most mainstream RWA protocols, supporting a total of 22 tokenized products, mainly in the private credit field. The difference between Aptos and zkSync is that Aptos supports more products from large institutions. Here are some simple examples: To revitalize the ecosystem through the popularity of RWA, I think Aptos still needs to enhance RWA asset liquidity within a compliance framework in the future, connecting traditional finance and DeFi ecosystems. The next step is to introduce blue chip protocols like Aave, and I estimate that there are also considerations in this regard. Simply put, the advantage of compliant RWA issuance is just becoming a qualified money printing factory, and if you want to make money, you still have to find a way to become a bank. Aptos zksync RWA