
Vand Ni|Asian bro|Aug 28, 2025 01:47
Yesterday, I noticed Camp went live, so I analyzed it a bit. Here's the summary:
The stuff on Camp exchange is trash, alpha isn’t even listed, and retail investors have no battlefield for trading. At the very least, all second-tier exchanges should list it.
Looking at the trading volume, the price was 0.2 in the first 2 hours after launch. The project team didn’t actively pump the price but did some buy-side community promotion.
However, judging by the sell volume, it’s highly likely they released all their early tokens for selling and got scammed by fake community channels, completely crashing the price.
The project’s financial strength is too weak, they should reflect on this:
1. Low circulation results in poor depth, causing selling pressure in the early stages. The goal of pumping the price should be to swap fake tokens for real ones.
Not to hold a bunch of worthless tokens and generously airdrop them. Using funds to stabilize the project would also work.
If you really love tokens that much, why not issue a meme token with the same name? You could even get listed on more exchanges.
2. Poor depth makes it impossible to form major trading activity.
Pumping the price needs to go hand-in-hand with volume increases. If the depth is too poor, no one dares to enter the market to trade.
If you want to take an unconventional path, luck matters a lot.
Share To
Timeline
HotFlash
APP
X
Telegram
CopyLink