To my knowledge, Northeasterners have a monopoly in the area of cross chain bridges A true story, there is a cross chain bridge that is manually recorded by interns in Excel. The boss wakes up every day and then makes payments, collecting from chain A and transferring to chain B. Don't laugh, this is actually the early operational mechanism of cross chain bridges, but later added some automation strategies and liquidity pool optimization. But is there only one mode of cross chain funding pool? Let's dive in! ⬇️ Why is cross chain bridge the most severely damaged track among all hacker attacks? The reason is surprisingly simple: there is money here. Traditional cross chain bridges rely on liquidity pools to lock assets in smart contracts to support cross chain transfers. For hackers, this is the fatal temptation of the "Honeypot". @DeBridge is different. Perhaps because its positioning and starting point were to serve DeFi, deBridge adopts a 0 TVL design. Simply put, it means that transactions are completed through dynamic matching between "Maker" and "Solver" without pre locking liquidity. Maker is a cross chain person who can create orders on the source chain, and even support precise limit orders; Solver is the receiver, who may be a market maker, arbitrageur, exchange or other role, accepting orders to fully utilize their liquidity to make money. This is the unique cross chain principle of deBridge, which includes many technical details such as asynchronous transactions and cross chain message passing, self-organizing liquidity networks, and decentralized verification that can be further studied. What I can see is that this uniqueness has brought several obvious advantages to deBridge: Multiple, supporting over 30 public chains Fast, close to instant settlement Province, no slippage, 0.04% to 0.08% spread Secure, no need to encapsulate assets, fully decentralized With these advantages, deBridge has become the top revenue player in the cross chain bridge track, with protocol revenue reaching up to $30 million and daily settlements exceeding $100 million. Just yesterday, they officially announced their support for the Tron chain. Sun Ge specifically tweeted about this matter, so that deBridge can be linked to popular concepts such as stablecoins and DATs, and revitalizing Tron assets is indeed a win-win situation. Tron has 4 million daily active USDTs, more than half of which rotate here, and has processed over $20 trillion in trading volume. Now users can directly cross chain any Tron asset on deBridge, especially for stablecoins with huge demand, without the need for CEX transfer anymore. Why do people from Northeast China have a dominant presence on the Cross Chain Bridge? I'm talking about deBridge's token DBR, haha. I'm used to calling them 'Northeasterners', which is easy to remember and friendly. DeBridge has a grand reserve plan, which is to use 100% of the agreement income to repurchase DBR. Currently, the treasury has $30 million waiting to be spent. Can you say the price of this currency is Another perspective of participation is to accumulate points. For every $1 paid on deBridge, you can earn 100 points, and 20% of DBR will be airdropped to the community. Now it's the second season, and in the first season, 600 million points were airdropped, totaling approximately 15 million. Trading, invitation, and integration can all earn points, it's clear now. / Author: Anymose | A Soft Core Science Popularization Writer This article is for educational purposes only and does not constitute any investment advice. Always remember DYOR!