1/ Formal logic vs dialectical logic is the divide between computation and philosophy: the former pursues consistency (no contradictions), while the latter pursues completeness (allowing contradictions and evolving through the unity of opposites). 2/ Formal logic is a proper subset of dialectical logic. It follows three main laws: the law of identity, the law of excluded middle, and the law of non-contradiction. But dialectical logic not only includes this contradiction-free reasoning, it also accommodates the generation and unity of opposing contradictions. 3/ Turing machine systems correspond to formal logic: they handle computable problems with consistency but are constrained by Gödel's incompleteness, unable to resolve undecidable propositions within the system. 4/ Turing ordinal logic systems correspond to dialectical logic: through transfinite iteration and oracle machine extensions, they allow reasoning and evolution at the boundaries of contradictions. This is the computational model that moves from consistency to completeness. 5/ Bitcoin combines both: Transaction verification (TX) = Turing machine system → ensures consistency. Block selection (fork resolution) = Oracle machine → resolves contradictions. Longest chain + PoW = Transfinite iteration → achieves unity within contradictions. 6/ This means: Bitcoin is not merely a consistency verification system, but a "superformal system" that integrates both consistency and completeness. 7/ Formal logic guarantees determinism but cannot explain how a system evolves within contradictions. Dialectical logic emphasizes the unity of contradictions. Bitcoin, through the PoW timechain, integrates the two into the first operational "superformal system" in reality.