Why do trash projects always love doing burns, staking, and buybacks? **Burns** On the surface, burns look like they’re reducing supply, but in reality, it’s because there are way too many tokens, and they can’t sell off their bags. If they sell even a small percentage, the whole market would collapse. So instead, they burn some tokens to make it look like the project has a grand vision, tricking retail investors into buying in. **Staking** They lure you in with high interest rates to get everyone to stake and earn rewards. Especially those with lock-up periods of one month, three months, or even a year. By the time you’ve staked, the interest you’ve earned is peanuts compared to the token price dropping by dozens of percentage points—or even dozens of times! Meanwhile, you can only watch helplessly as the price crashes, unable to do anything. Staking is just a way to trap retail investors, while the project team’s tokens remain liquid and free. **Buybacks** This is just the project team using a tiny bit of profit to create the illusion of prosperity. Most project teams will choose a time when trading volume is super low and liquidity is poor, so they can use a small amount of funds to pump the price with a big green candle. This tricks users into thinking the team is “walking the talk” and has a “grand vision”! It’s all to attract uninformed investors to buy in. I heard #WLFI started doing burns right after launch. Figure it out for yourselves... …