Charts
DataOn-chain
VIP
Market Cap
API
Rankings
CoinOSNew
CoinClaw🦞
Language
  • 简体中文
  • 繁体中文
  • English
Leader in global market data applications, committed to providing valuable information more efficiently.

Features

  • Real-time Data
  • Special Features
  • AI Grid

Services

  • News
  • Open Data(API)
  • Institutional Services

Downloads

  • Desktop
  • Android
  • iOS

Contact Us

  • Chat Room
  • Business Email
  • Official Email
  • Official Verification

Join Community

  • Telegram
  • Twitter
  • Discord

© Copyright 2013-2026. All rights reserved.

简体繁體English
|Legacy
BTCBTC
💲71807.68
+
1.5%
ETHETH
💲2119.28
+
2.07%
SOLSOL
💲88.57
+
1.9%
USDCUSDC
💲0.9998
-
0%
TRUMPTRUMP
💲4.01
-
0.5%
WLDWLD
💲0.3588
+
1.5%

gm365
gm365|9月 05, 2025 06:10
APR myth: Yearly 100% too high, daily chemical 100% too low MEME can't handle it. Recently, they have started researching on chain wealth management, such as JupLend. I opened several positions yesterday, and the highest APY could reach 130%+, but I didn't dare, so I ultimately chose around 80%. A 'midpoint' after weighing risk and return. Annualized APY is 80%, and daily chemical is approximately 0.2%. Compared to the previous standards for MEME LP, 100% of daily chemical products are considered low, and the page does not display>999%. It feels like they have failed to select their own pool. Why is it so 'divided'? Annualized 100% is too high, daily chemical 100% is too low. Simply put, yield is a compensation for risk. The higher the risk, the higher the required rate of return. What if RUG collapses? Calculating annualized returns for high-risk pool LPs is meaningless because they may collapse and run away in the next hour. Under the premise of extremely high risk, participating in speculation naturally hopes for higher short-term returns. But "wealth management" products are different. At least you think your principal is safe and you can hold it for a long time, even imagining the total return in the next year. From this perspective, an annualized yield of 80% is also a quite astonishing number, and it can be confirmed that the risks involved are not low (such as position liquidation caused by a decline in collateral prices). In this sense, this cannot be considered a simple "breakeven wealth management" product, but also a high-risk non breakeven leveraged income product. Of course, we cannot forget the potential 'opportunity cost'. If you hold SOL (or other tokens), will the return exceed 80% after one year. The real wealth management products in the cryptocurrency industry are roughly equivalent to: ⬛ CEX's stablecoin wealth management (annualized 5% to 10%) ⬛ Staking on the chain (ETH 2.8%, SOL 8%) Speculation Farming、 Financial management allows you to freely choose based on the size and risk tolerance of your funds, or allocate them proportionally.
Mentioned
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Timeline

9月 29, 17:39Selection and Evaluation of New Listing Platforms on the Market
9月 26, 08:10BTC ETH settlement ends, choose a direction
9月 04, 16:02synthetix_io mainnet allows positions to simultaneously earn yields

HotFlash

|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

APP
Windows
Mac

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Hot Reads