To summarize, if you don't like watching Aquas, don't watch them. I wrote it for the person who asked me a question. My computer is overheating and I'm typing it again. I hope I can resolve the issue. I don't know what you're hoping for 1. The one without cross chain and transferring money to the exchange is a privacy swap. The characteristics of huodini swap. But it's hard to say if it's a mixed currency. What I mean is that the KYC obtained from contacting the exchange is also huodini's, not from this project The project team's explanation is that they do not want scientists to track funds for arbitrage. I would like to explain again that I am paraphrasing the official article, not my viewpoint. I was clever enough to report and ban the account where the official article was published. Official announcement cannot be released 2. The English community has a detailed analysis of over 20000 SOLs for this project, most of which do not come from individual investors. From another rug plate. Please verify on your own 3. Sol's semi official @ meteora and another symmio with 15 institutional investments have all contributed to this project. It is also a false rumor that the audit agency is running away. Those who have the ability can follow these three lines. 4. I don't know which big brother is reporting this project across the entire platform, causing it to be unable to release information to the public. A medium that was just re registered has posted an article stating that The project was originally expected to raise 2000 sol, but did not set a hard top to raise 20000 sol. According to the original rules, the opening selling pressure will be more than twice the liquidity. It will cause the opening to drop to zero. So the rules were modified before the opening. The initial liquidity will be increased by only 1000sol as originally planned. The remaining liquidity will be added at a later time after the price stabilizes. Additionally, it becomes two unlocking modes. I hereby declare that I am only paraphrasing the project party's statement to those who have not seen the original text of the project party. I don't think there is a contradiction in this explanation, but I want to rephrase it. ok？ That's about all the information I currently have. I can't keep my eyes open anymore. Turn on the computer and search again. If there's any new information, I'll add it What I'm thinking is to solve the problem. I don't know what you're thinking