Seems many people have misunderstood what we were trying to say in the below post, as our language was not as good as it should have been. We apologise for that. To be clear, we are NOT trying to say: * The new business idea Bob eluded to in the email, would be a business engaging in censorship What we were trying to say was: 1. The new business Bob eluded to may benefit from a weaker Bitcoin P2P transaction relay network 2. There is a campaign to try to get relay nodes to have a tighter policy than that of transactions that regularly get mined. This email thread was about that. The impact of this campaign (if highly successful) could be a weaker transaction relay network 3. OCEAN, which Bob is a board member of, is part of that campaign (However, OCEAN might do other things which are positive, such that the net impact of OCEAN on the space could be positive)