What is angle theory, and what makes a valuable piece of content? To be honest, I rarely write long-winded analyses of projects anymore. Narratives, technology, funding backgrounds—this kind of information has long been abundant, even to the point of becoming off-putting. Ever since infofi emerged, AI-generated content has flooded the space, and basic fundamental analysis of projects is now just a quick search away—repetitive and uninspired. Even Twitter’s algorithm is suppressing this type of content. Take the project @ChainOpera_AI, for example. How would you write about it? If you stick to the old formula—covering funding, technology, and various background details—it’s going to perform poorly. But if we refine the information further: AI infrastructure, Binance investment, clients like Samsung, a team with strong AI expertise, and cutting-edge concepts like AI Agents and privacy protection in both narrative and technology. At first glance, there’s a lot of information here, but if you boil it down, it’s essentially: this is a resource-rich, well-backed, and technically strong AI project. This information is actually sufficient, but you can’t just present it bluntly. If it were me, I might start with a relatable industry anxiety, offer a perspective or opinion, and then transition into ChainOpera’s details. In this process, users gain emotional value while also absorbing the information. Beyond the information itself, what truly resonates with people is the angle: a story, a sense of connection, or even just the thought, “Wow, I didn’t know you could write it like this.” Getting people to want to read, and leaving them with something valuable after they’ve read—that’s what makes content worthwhile, and it’s the essence of angle theory. Hope the soft content I shared yesterday brought you some good luck—coai hit ATH!