Charts
DataOn-chain
VIP
Market Cap
API
Rankings
CoinOSNew
CoinClaw🦞
Language
  • 简体中文
  • 繁体中文
  • English
Leader in global market data applications, committed to providing valuable information more efficiently.

Features

  • Real-time Data
  • Special Features
  • AI Grid

Services

  • News
  • Open Data(API)
  • Institutional Services

Downloads

  • Desktop
  • Android
  • iOS

Contact Us

  • Chat Room
  • Business Email
  • Official Email
  • Official Verification

Join Community

  • Telegram
  • Twitter
  • Discord

© Copyright 2013-2026. All rights reserved.

简体繁體English
|Legacy
BTCBTC
💲72497.86
+
3.2%
ETHETH
💲2129.09
+
2.99%
SOLSOL
💲90.01
+
3.89%
USDCUSDC
💲0.9998
-
0.01%
XRPXRP
💲1.43
+
2.88%
DOGEDOGE
💲0.09888
+
5.63%

BitMEX Research
BitMEX Research|10月 09, 2025 23:06
OP_Return2 - Overview With intense debates over the default OP_Return relay limit continuing, some have suggested OP_Return2 as a potential solution. We have summarised our understanding of OP_Return2 below. OP_Return2 is a new proposed transaction output, that contains a hash commitment to up to 8MB of arbitrary data, but the arbitrary data itself is not required by nodes to check if a block is valid. Therefore full nodes and miners do not need to validate, propagate or store the extra data. Miners would just ignore the arbitrary data and therefore it would not contribute to mining centralisation pressure. OP_Return2 is a softfork change to the block weight formula as follows: 8 * base data + 2 * witness data + "claimed" OP_Return2 data store < 8 million units Special full data archive nodes can relay and store the extra arbitrary data, if they can find the data or if the data even exists. The consensus rules would only require that the amount of extra data is specified, the consensus rules don't actually require the extra data itself. A fee to the miners is then paid based on the amount of data specified in the transaction. This is a new compromise option for data. Potential Disadvantages * It is not clear if anyone would be willing to pay a fee for this extra data, if there is no reason for miners or full nodes to store the data. This new feature may not offer that much more than OpenTimestamps for example, but it would be much more expensive per byte. * It might be unnecessary to do a softfork and change the weight formula, when it's already possible to put a hash of data in the Blockchain and to use a separate storage system/network. * The extra spam data can still outbid legitimate payment related transactions and receive a steeper fee discount per byte. The size limit is now 8MB per block. Therefore, 8MB of spam images could outbid legitimate transactions, for the same cost as a 4MB inscription in the Taproot witness.(BitMEX Research)
+5
Mentioned
|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Timeline

10月 27, 23:20The staking queue data has been fixed.
10月 21, 15:41Using hydropower to mine Bitcoin
10月 16, 20:17Ethereum Classic evolves into a sovereign-compatible EVM PoW network
10月 14, 14:55Hardware sniffs Bitcoin miner traffic via satellite
10月 09, 12:53Bitcoin miners build AI data centers
9月 26, 20:45Consider soft fork or hard fork to address the spam issue
9月 22, 01:40FHEVM enables controllable privacy for silent miners
9月 18, 13:38Changing the default relay policy affects block propagation speed
9月 18, 11:27Incentiv's new PoW design disrupts tradition
9月 17, 02:20Analysis of Bitcoin and Monero Hashrate and Security

HotFlash

|
APP
Windows
Mac
Share To

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

APP
Windows
Mac

X

Telegram

Facebook

Reddit

CopyLink

Hot Reads