The Consensus Game of Prefix 4 and Suffix 4: Binance Exclusives' Advantages and Disadvantages It all started when @OdailyChina wrote a short post, and then someone deployed 'Xiao Su.' At the 100k stage, the CA primarily circulating in the Chinese community was Prefix 4: 0x4444457abe839b4853011b4bbece27cdd7084e96 People also added the angle 'CZ followed this account,' which led to it being shared across about a dozen groups. After group members discovered it, they also found the Suffix 4 CA: 0xe52358d309953f319a811944a4b649c66ec34444 Before Prefix 4 launched, the wallets were untagged, so there wasn’t much information available. As a result, its spread mainly relied on word-of-mouth within the community. However, after the Suffix 4 CA gained traction, it caught the attention of @feibo03, who then made a purchase. Feibo’s purchase caused the Suffix 4 project to skyrocket during the sub-1M phase (from the time group members discovered it to when Feibo’s purchase brought in traffic, it surged by over 200x). From the current perspective, during the sub-1M phase, if a Binance-exclusive project performs well, Suffix 4 has a greater advantage. Group leaders and KOLs are more likely to prioritize options with larger public traffic. Once the Binance-exclusive Prefix 4 project breaks out of the sub-1M range and enters the public domain, the Suffix 4 project will immediately lose its advantage—essentially marking the last chance to exit. On the other hand, despite starting at the same time—or even later—Suffix 4 has managed to deliver higher returns compared to projects within Binance exclusives.