The reason I was optimistic about MEFAI at the time was that after @heyibinance commented, I went back and read the entire article from start to finish. Here’s a quick summary of a few key points: 1. Binance was also a victim this time. The big crash wasn’t caused by Binance, but the main battlefield was on Binance. 2. The reasons behind the big crash, as well as some issues with market makers. 3. @cz_binance did not sell off BNB. When I got to point 3, I felt like they used AI to help Binance resolve the marketing-level market crisis, cleared CZ of suspicion, and then Yijie commented again. So I decided to take a gamble on CZ’s interaction. After looking around, some people are saying the next phase is AI. I feel like a lot of people don’t even read the article before making judgments—it’s really misleading. Some are even talking about conspiracies. As for who holds the bottom-level chips, I don’t have any markers on that (if there are any address experts out there, feel free to reach out—after all, I’ve been on a six-month break and just came back). But I feel like the chances of a conspiracy are low because Yijie’s reply gave a pretty long opportunity window. From my personal perspective, the part I can understand is that during a market crisis, someone stepped in to help solve the problem, used AI to prove innocence, and even gave some praise. The interaction seems pretty normal to me.