The relationship between 'Dao' and 'Technique,' in my opinion, is that you should first dive into the real-world speculative environment to learn the 'technique,' and then circle back to explore the 'Dao.' During the DeFi era, I went through no less than 10 instances of being scammed/FOMO-ed/rugged/self-deluded. I also experienced 100x returns in a month, leveraged high profits, and eventually faced a pullback. During the inscription era, I went through copying $ORDI until it halved, playing with Ordinals NFTs and various inscriptions—90% of which ended in losses. In the end, $ORDI delivered decent results. During the Solana meme era, I blindly speculated and lost 60%, played $ACT and got rugged, but later $ACT successfully listed on Binance. In the second wave of AI, I managed to catch about half of the major upward trends. If you haven’t gone through these experiences and just jump straight into discussing the 'Dao,' I’m afraid it won’t work. It’s like only looking at the menu—you can’t understand what steak tastes like. You need to get in the game yourself, to be scammed/rugged/FOMO-ed/trapped, to feel all the euphoria and immense pain, to experience both sudden wealth and bankruptcy. Then, we can talk about the 'Dao of investing.'