In this market where decisions are driven by self-interest, you’ll always see all kinds of self-justified perspectives stemming from FOMO. At its core, it’s not about whether the narrative is good or not—it’s about whether you’ve bought in or not. When this kind of normalized content dominates a large portion of market voices, there’s actually no issue. Holding means building, building means growth, and fundamentally, it’s a beneficial behavior for the community. But there are always some bad actors who FUD what others have just because they own something, intentionally creating friction. Under this friction, there are also those with malicious intent who mislead others by using seemingly logical but actually deceptive content, guiding their followers to trust them and achieve the goal of tearing others down. It’s like the most lowb moments often seen at certain domestic product launches: “Our product is so much better compared to XXX.” If you truly believe your product is the best, why compare it to others? This kind of childish “tearing others down” mentality is the most laughable (like saying, “If the neighbor’s brother dares to eat crap, your brother must do it too”). Market trading is no longer stuck in the era of pumping prices through information alone. On-chain data is rising, and the influence of on-chain transactions is continuously expanding. The era of relying on talk to pump and find buyers is gradually declining. The influence model in the crypto space is also evolving with the development of the internet—from the era of portal websites to the app era, from the media era to the on-chain data era. Influence has always been shifting and alternating in various forms and identities. Data doesn’t lie to anyone.