October 10th, @Infinit_Labs listed on a Korean exchange. That explains the big green candle for $IN. But can you explain why, after the S2 airdrop was fully unlocked and distributed, and even with the market pulling back, it didn’t follow the dip? Sure, the AI+DeFi sector is hot, and Binance and Bitget wallets are willing to support it. But is that background alone enough? Looking at the tokenomics before, there wasn’t any buyback from revenue. But after taking a closer look at staking, I was shocked. The staking APY is over 30%, as shown in the chart. Turns out, when INFINIT’s AI agent executes user strategies (like cross-chain yield farming or swaps), it charges small fees (e.g., 0.1-0.5% execution fees, gas optimization fees). The gas optimization fee refers to the savings it helps you achieve. A portion of these fees (percentage not disclosed, but estimated at 20-50%) is directly distributed to IN stakers. So far, the protocol has processed over 600,000 transactions, with a TVL of $63 million. The fees accumulate quickly, pushing the staking APY higher. As for the project’s future, you can check out the team’s recent tweet: ‘Why smart people in the future will choose AI-assisted arbitrage and yield farming instead of doing it manually.’ If you’re satisfied with the current TVL and transaction data, and you’re willing to buy into the team’s vision for the future, then the current strong performance of the token price makes sense. This reminds me of a joke: Your mom thinks hand-washed underwear is cleaner than machine-washed. You think manual arbitrage makes more money than AI-assisted arbitrage...