Recently, I discovered something quite interesting: Many projects are shouting 'we have verified/we are transparent', but users feel disheartened when they open it - data cannot be checked, scripts cannot be viewed, and rules cannot be explained by anyone. I sighed as I watched this scene: it's not a technical problem, but the lack of a 'trust' structure. So I set my sights on @ brevis_zk. This is a project forwarded by V God. After a few days of observation, the siege lion has some new feelings: The era of "rule black boxes" may be coming to an end Brevis recently emphasized publicly that its ZK Coprocessor not only includes historical state access, but also includes "non behavioral" proofs and cross protocol behavioral hybrid computing. That is to say, it not only counts as what you have done, but also proves that you have not done something. Once this ability is truly utilized, it will fundamentally upgrade the incentive system. The Siege Lion believes that when 'not done' can be proven, the script party is difficult to play, cheating costs increase, and the rest is the contributors themselves. Recent cooperation cases have revealed a signal: For example, the collaboration between Bedrock DeFi/Brevis explicitly states a stacked structure of "user activity+multi chain tracking+ZK verification". What does this mean? The protocol no longer uses single chain or single action to determine user value. The reward formula may become "multi protocol interaction x time accumulation x depth of behavior". Early actors (participating in the community, creating content, calling protocols) may gain greater weight in the future. The viewpoint of the siege lion: You are not waiting for airdrops, you are accumulating "mathematically recognized contribution points". 3/"Historical data+negative behavior proof" is the next killer use case Most people only think about 'how many trades have I made', but the truly advanced ones are 'I haven't cancelled orders for several months in a row/I'm active in multiple protocols/I haven't participated in volume boosting'. Brevis' technology is currently supporting scenarios such as smart contracts taking historical states, executing negative behavior judgments, and generating proofs. Siege Lion Judgment: When this type of calculation becomes mainstream, the reward mechanism shifts from "watching what you did today" to "watching your real participation and behavior trajectory in the past six months". This is a huge opportunity for content creators and early contributors to the community. 4/But it's not risk-free/challenge free either If the computing power and nodes of the verification network are concentrated, it is equivalent to giving large players another opportunity to monopolize. Negative behavior "proves that if the mechanism design overflow is not sufficient, it may be gamified instead. Early community participation may be a soft behavior (content+dissemination), but later on chain behavior is a real difference. Siege Lion suggests that if you want to participate, you should set up both "soft behavior" and "on chain behavior" instead of just scrolling through content. Daily suggestion: Post content → Interactive diffusion → Deepen protocol invocation. Build an identity path from observer to contributor. 5/One sentence summary: In Brevis' world, contribution is not achieved through shouting, but through mathematics and trajectory. If you do it truthfully, it can prove it; You didn't do it, it can still see. Here, transparency is no longer just propaganda, but verifiable system rules. ”- Siege Lion Link: https://proving-grounds.brevis.network/c4bZnG