Is China's removal of Li Chenggang's permanent representative to the World Trade Organization a gesture of goodwill towards the United States? Last week, in an interview, Beisen directly dismissed Li Chenggang, China's international trade negotiator and Deputy Minister of Commerce, several times, saying that he came to Washington in August "uninvited" and even used "mentally deranged" language. Today, I saw the notice of appointment and removal of Chinese diplomats stating that Li Chenggang has been relieved of his duties as the Permanent Representative of the People's Republic of China to the World Trade Organization, Ambassador Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary, and Deputy Representative to the United Nations Office at Geneva and other international organizations in Switzerland. Some interpretations suggest that this is a goodwill gesture from China towards the United States, but in reality, it is not the case According to the official website of the Ministry of Commerce, Li Chenggang's title is still Deputy Secretary of the Party Group, International Trade Negotiator (Ministerial level), and Deputy Minister. Before being appointed as the Chinese International Trade Negotiator in April this year, Li Chenggang had already served as the Chinese Permanent Representative to the World Trade Organization, at the level of Vice Minister. Equivalent to Li Chenggang holding multiple positions before his dismissal today. At this point, removing the other lower level positions he concurrently held was clearly to allow him to focus on his main role as an "international trade negotiator". And normally, with a higher-level new position, removing the old position is just a normal process. Obviously, Li Chenggang's current focus is on international trade negotiations, which is like a fool. It's like the leader saying, "Comrade Chenggang, this international trade negotiation work is of utmost importance at the moment. You can focus on the negotiations and don't worry about other things for now Regarding the Malaysia talks between China and the United States this week, or is it here this morning at https://(x.com)/qinba frank/status/198008709620869672? S=46&t=k6rimWsEbo2D2tXolYcM-A talked about "China has taken part of the initiative this time. Judging from the statements made by both sides last week, Trump and Besant have released enough willingness to ease, and of course China has also expressed the willingness to meet and talk. Of course, the most important thing is the result of the discussion: one person expects the biggest result is to delay the implementation of all kinds of sanctions thrown to the other party in the past few weeks, and then talk slowly after delaying the outflow time. If this is the case, it is probably that the market performance is acceptable, at least not to give everyone a pause. Of course, if some sanctions and countermeasures are cancelled or their intensity is reduced, That should be the result that the market will think is better, and the mood will be more buoyant. Reaching a complete agreement or a complete breakdown of the negotiation may both be small probability events. The former is due to irreconcilable conflicts between the two sides, which can only be eased, and both sides are trading time for space; The latter is because both sides have constraints and do not support directly tearing apart the face. ” This article is sponsored by the meme trading tool http://(xxyy. io) | Fast trading, versatile features, use @ useXXYyo to monitor on chain wallets