What’s the real difference between B2B and B2C projects? For B2C businesses, it’s more about operations. Even with poor tech, there’s still a chance to make it work. B2B, on the other hand, is different. If the tech is bad, no one will use it. Brevis is a classic B2B player. Brevis might be the first ZK project to not only secure $9M support from a veteran DeFi like Uni, but also receive open support or direct collaboration from Vitalik, the Ethereum Foundation, the Ethereum ecosystem, and Binance. This level of backing shows that Brevis’s tech is strong and impressive enough. You can see this from the Pico Prism released on the 15th of this month. It completed 99.6% of Ethereum block proofs within 12 seconds, with an average time of just 6.9 seconds. The key is, it doesn’t require heavy hardware—consumer-grade GPUs are enough. The result? Costs are significantly ahead of competitors. Naturally, this means more institutions are willing to pay on the application side. That’s why you can already see Brevis in over 20+ protocols. Of course, this doesn’t mean there’s no chance for B2C participation. The team is running a Brevis experiment activity, which is essentially a points campaign. The first phase ends on November 2nd. For B2B businesses, the lower limit is determined by tech, and the upper limit is determined by the industry. But no matter how high it goes in the future, at least the fundamentals are relatively easy to identify.