Although both are called Builder Codes, Polymarket and Hyperliquid are quite different. For Hyperliquid, Builder Codes embed order data as parameters linked to specific builder addresses, allowing traffic sources to be distinguished and tracked on-chain. Polymarket Builder, on the other hand, mainly integrates through API keys and Relayer clients, which are off-chain. Native and Builder transactions seem impossible to differentiate directly from on-chain tx. The Polymarket Builder interface data is too rough. Initially, I wanted to reorganize it based on on-chain data, but in the end, I couldn’t figure anything out and had to start with the front-end data. Using GPT, I extracted the pre-rendered JSON data from the Polymarket Builder interface and re-output it to Dune: https://(dune.com)/defioasis/pmbuilders Currently, there are 10+ trading bots integrated into Polymarket Builder Codes, with betmoar having the highest trading volume. Since integrating Builder Codes, its cumulative trading volume has exceeded $40 million, with daily trading volume consistently above $2 million, maintaining over 60% market share. Although the Polymarket Builder interface doesn’t display user data, it can still be scraped from the front end. These 10+ trading bots have a daily active user count of just 500-600, and only three bots have daily active users exceeding 100: UnifAI Network, betmoar, and Polycule. The sector overall is still very, very early-stage.