Shocked by the magical power of being 'pumped' by group friends/netizens. Although I think it’s just a coincidence, I’m still flattered and want to chat about the possible logic behind it: 1) I never directly call for trades, but the transformation of 'influence' brought by analyzing the underlying logic of technical narratives shouldn’t be underestimated. Quick trading signals might be more direct, but investment decisions made after in-depth research have more impact. Besides dreams, when I recently published an article about caffeine, ICP was just $6; sometimes cognitive frameworks are more powerful than trading signals. 2) Objective and professional technical analysis combined with insights into commercial evolution influence not only retail investors’ mindset but also Devs, VCs, and a lot of Smart Money (the leaders). This type of investment, based on cognitive logic and rational judgment, might not yield immediate results, but it stands the test of time and offers a more composed holding experience. 3) I’ve always believed that the opportunity window for on-chain technical narratives is far more favorable than pure MEMEs (especially industrialized, assembly-line MEMEs). This is because the cognitive evangelism of on-chain innovation, product innovation, and market fermentation takes enough time, giving retail investors sufficient time to learn, research, and exit. In games purely driven by emotions and capital battles, ordinary retail investors simply don’t have the time to research and react. Fortunately, the market will self-adjust its 'main narrative.'