On the Contract Spirit of Web3 Seeing Pan retrieve Euler's stolen assets, I recall my previous WBTC with @ element_fi. Element has also been included in the "innovation project" of the previous cycle. Several numbers have been deposited into WBTC assets, but they have been forgotten to retrieve them. Until the project announced its transformation, the original project was closed, the official website could not be accessed, and the new project quickly went bankrupt. I have tried several times before and want to retrieve the previous assets. Speaking of which, there aren't many, and the sum of a few numbers is only about one or two hundred units. But unfortunately, it cannot be retrieved. Firstly, the official website provided a GitHub repository frontend that can be deployed by oneself, and then attempted to extract it. This plan is too complicated to skip. Attempt to extract from smart contract, parameters too complex, tried, give up. Later, it was discovered that someone had deployed a third-party front-end, and now it can finally be accessed. Repeated errors were reported as a result. After double checking, I found the problem: Someone took all the valuable assets in the smart contract at once, causing other people who are truly eligible to withdraw to encounter an error of insufficient balance. Who has the authority to do this? It goes without saying. The project team that tricked the father. No one blames you for the collapse of the project. Stealing assets stored in smart contracts by users is truly a heinous crime. Seriously violating the spirit of the contract is a betrayal of the original intention of the invention of smart contracts. The retained funds in the smart contract of this project, if I remember correctly, are probably several hundred thousand dollars, probably left by people who forgot to withdraw or didn't know how to withdraw them. In the end, the project ran away and user funds were stolen by authorized individuals. Even if you lose money frying MEME, it's not that uncomfortable. It's just your own food, I admit it; But when the money from the smart contract is taken away by the project party, it feels like being betrayed. Since that's the case, DeBank should not display these funds, purely adding to the congestion.