This is a pretty typical case in the current market, definitely not an isolated one. A CEX certainly has the right to list or delist any project according to its own rules. If you're unhappy, just switch to another CEX—there's not much to argue about here. It's just a pity about the high listing fees. Max talked to me about it. Bitget delisting Oort seems to be because the 15-minute trading candlestick chart wasn’t continuous. This isn’t hard to understand—when the market is bad, CEXs naturally become stricter with projects that don’t generate trading fees. What’s worth discussing is that the current screening mechanisms of CEXs seem to have completely failed, with trading data becoming the sole criterion. In the U.S. and Hong Kong stock markets, there are many companies that had very low trading volumes for a period of time, but that didn’t stop them from becoming great later on. Oort isn’t an exceptional project, but after being online for a few years, its market cap is still in the tens of millions of dollars, and its active product users are in the hundreds of thousands. Its flagship product, AI DataHub, has been integrated into several mainstream wallets like Binance. I haven’t done the stats, but my gut feeling is that its fundamentals are better than 90% of the projects that only launched on Bitget. If I’m wrong, feel free to correct me with data. A project like Oort gets delisted, while a bunch of air projects with no product, no users, and just candlestick charts become mainstream. As a VC, I find this industry pretty surreal. My advice to Max: find another place to play, maybe another CEX or just go straight to a DEX. If you have users and can make money, why worry about not having a place to trade?