2026 Hairdressing Guide: Choosing is 100 times more important than effort! Based on the top KOL opinions compiled by @ BiteyeCN, summarize the "four major military rules" for this 2026 airdrop screening project. one ️⃣ Prioritize high certainty tracks, but avoid overheated areas: The expectation for Perp DEX in 2026 has been lowered, resulting in a dual dilution of liquidity and returns. Unless there is a mechanism for offsetting, it is not recommended to heavily invest. New trend: Predict Market+Robotics. KOL Insights: @Y95277777: The end of Perp DEX has arrived, and in 2026, we must turn to Prediction Market 2.0 (driven by World Cup events). @Cryptolfggo: Optimistic about Variational and has the potential to become the successor of Lighter in 2026. @YourQuantGuy: Most new Perp projects have severe homogenization, so we will remain cautious in 2026. two ️⃣ In depth evaluation of financing, team, and product competitiveness Check financing, resume, real product strength (PMF), and revenue KOL Insights: @EvanCCrypto17: Digging deep into the Lighter team, ZK technology, and RWA derivatives, the core of which is the technological moat. @Y95277777: Resolutely choose infrastructure projects with a "free handling fee+high liquidity" bottom layer. @YourQuantGuy: Products must be attractive enough, projects that are simply nested cannot survive. three ⃣ Time Window: Capture the Trigger Point of Major Events 2026 is a big year for "sports+technology", with a very short window period. KOL Insights: @Hellosuoha: Clearly state that the 2026 World Cup is the core engine that ignites the prediction market/Robotics. @Cryptolfggo: The Variational points program is still in its early stages, and this early window period is the last opportunity for retail investors to enter. @Y95277777: Prioritize Q1-Q2 for upcoming TGE projects, with the highest certainty. Additionally, with my own perspective, four ⃣ Examining the design of airdrop mechanism and historical fairness: Choose projects with clear points traceability and real interactive rewards. Referring to the past airdrop pattern of the project party (generous vs. stingy, anti cheating history), prioritize the "face saving" teams (with revenue repurchase potential). Do you think it's helpful?