Similar incidents have been discussed before, and the most straightforward answer is: if the money is given to you now, and later the actual KYC user logs in and asks OKX for the assets, then should the assets be given or not? And to whom? For example, let’s say the author bought my KYC, and then OKX refunds the author. At this point, I log into OKX and ask why my assets were transferred away—how would OKX respond? The fact that someone transferred the funds doesn’t necessarily mean the money belongs to them. At most, it proves they are the 'source of the funds,' but not the 'legitimate account holder.' This serves as a reminder to everyone: if the KYC isn’t yours, then the money isn’t yours either. Not your KEY, not your coin. Not your KYC, not your money. Of course, I understand the 'human touch' and 'warmth' that the author mentioned, but this isn’t something a third-party institution can judge. Unless the person who sold the KYC to the author can be found and logs in via facial recognition, I honestly can’t think of a secure way to claim this money. I do sympathize with the author, and if needed, I’m willing to offer a small bit of help.