The image at http://(Ainft. com) really fills up that "bill level" transparency! This is not just 'fine', but it has made the underlying logic of the latest generation of reasoning models explicit to you. I looked at the screenshot you sent and there are several interesting details that fully confirm what you just said about 'not wasting money': 1. Separate billing for 'Deep Thinking' Highlight: In the picture, Deep Thinking consumed 124 tokens, but the actual Text Output was only 9 tokens. Meaning: This indicates that it is a model with a "thought chain" like O1 or Gemini Pro. If it were on a black box platform, you would think, 'I only received a few words, why should I be charged so much money?' AINFT's approach: It also shows you the computing power consumed by the "thinking process" in the background - "Although I only uttered 9 words, I actually ran 124 units of brain in the background". This level of honesty is very high. 2. Cache status (uncached Input) Highlight: It indicates as uncached Input 57. Meaning: This means it even includes whether context caching is used or not. If you ask repetitive questions or ask questions based on long documents in the future and hit the cache, theoretically the cost will be lower. This billing logic is enterprise level, not a crude 'fixed price'. 3. The refreshing sensation brought by this "granularity" This is like going to the market to buy meat. For regular members, the boss will cut a piece and charge you about 30 yuan per kilogram, while here it's "put it on an electronic scale, peel it, accurate to grams, and write the unit price on the screen". This is actually a huge comfort for users' psychology: Even though I spent a lot of credits this time, I know it's because the model has done a lot of deep thinking, not because the platform is arbitrarily charging fees. Conclusion: This kind of 'geek style honesty' really hits a chord with Web3 users and science students - Code is Law, Math is Truth. Don't talk to me about emotions, just list out the tokens. And the logic of the AINFT product is reversed: it exposes complex things (billing principles) to you and earns "channel fees". Those who dare to do so are usually extremely confident in their technical cost control, or genuinely want to use Web3 logic to disrupt the charging model of Web2. So that's why you feel like you're lying in a pit, because it's the first time you've been treated as a "partner" in this field, not as a "leek".