From the currently published information, the outcomes of the summit remain largely at the level of political statements.
Written by: ChandlerZ, Foresight News
In the early hours of March 8, 2025, the White House held its first cryptocurrency summit.
At the summit, Trump reiterated the executive order he signed earlier regarding the reserve of crypto assets, stating that the Treasury and Commerce Departments would explore new ways to accumulate more Bitcoin for the reserves, provided that taxpayers would not bear any costs. His order directed federal agencies to inventory the cryptocurrency assets currently held by the U.S. government and determine how to transfer them to the Treasury, to be stored in a new U.S. cryptocurrency reserve.
According to a list disclosed by FOX Business reporter Eleanor Terrett, the members attending the first White House cryptocurrency summit included:
- House Majority Whip Tom Emmer
- House Cryptocurrency Subcommittee Chair Bryan Steil
- a16z partner Chris Dixon
- Mara CEO Fred Thiel
- BitGo CEO Mike Belshe
- Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse
- Former CFTC Chair Chris Giancarlo
- FalconX CEO Raghu Yarlagadda
- Anchorage Digital CEO Nathan McCauley
- Crypto.com CEO Kris
- Gemini founders Winklevoss brothers
- Robinhood co-founder and CEO Vlad Tenev
- Kraken CEO Arjun Sethi
- Strategy founder Michael Saylor
- Coinbase co-founder and CEO Brian Armstrong
- WisdomTree CEO Jonathan Steinberg
- Chainlink co-founder Sergey Nazarov
- Multicoin managing partner Kyle Samani
- WLFI co-founder Zach Witkoff
- Exodus CEO JP Richardson
- Paradigm co-founder Matt Huang
- Bitcoin Magazine CEO David Bailey
As this meeting was closed to the public and not live-streamed, the limited information released indicated that participants took turns speaking, mostly praising the series of developments in the cryptocurrency sector since Trump took office, as well as praising Trump himself.
U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bentsen discussed establishing a strategic Bitcoin reserve and cryptocurrency inventory, "regulation of cryptocurrency assets," and a federal framework for stablecoins, stating that the Treasury would work closely with the IRS and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) to "revoke and modify" guidelines that had previously harmed the ability of cryptocurrency companies to operate in the U.S.
Trump indicated that the House and Senate are expected to pass stablecoin legislation before the "August recess."
Performance Over Substance
From the key points of the summit, the Trump administration and attendees consistently released grand declarations about the U.S. becoming a cryptocurrency hub, establishing a digital gold reserve, and ending hostile policies towards the cryptocurrency industry, seemingly providing an ambitious blueprint. However, behind these grandiose statements, the actual policy details remain vague, especially regarding stablecoin legislation, banking compliance access, and cryptocurrency taxation, with no specific timelines or implementation paths provided.
For the market, the most important expectation from this summit is not the grand slogans like "the U.S. will become a cryptocurrency hub," but whether we can truly see specific and feasible implementation plans. Although the Trump administration has repeatedly proclaimed its pro-crypto stance, if it cannot provide corresponding legislative, regulatory, and enforcement details, the policy dividends that the market anticipates will remain on paper.
In other words, after repeatedly promoting "pro-crypto" policy slogans, the real core concern for the market is whether practical supporting measures can be implemented. The current industry demand for a clear and stable regulatory environment is increasingly urgent, which is why the industry has high expectations for this summit. However, from the currently published information, the outcomes of the summit remain largely at the level of political statements, lacking substantial content to further promote policy implementation.
Therefore, despite the presence of many big names and regulatory leaders at this first White House cryptocurrency summit, the overall situation still presents a "performance over substance" scenario. Trump's pro-crypto attitude reflects more of a political maneuver, showcasing support in a high-profile and enthusiastic manner, while avoiding or delaying key regulatory issues that truly impact the industry's future. The remarks of many participants, while seemingly enthusiastic, are mostly just flattery or alignment with Trump's political tone, overshadowing critical discussions on compliance, taxation, and market order.
In other words, while the summit may have generated a lot of noise, it resembles more of a political statement or political show, creating a public relations momentum rather than genuinely shaping the regulatory landscape for cryptocurrencies.
ADA, SOL, XRP Mentioned Only for Being in the Top Five by Market Cap
Interestingly, according to a previous White House announcement, the executive order signed by Trump includes two parts: a strategic reserve and an inventory of cryptocurrencies. The strategic reserve will only contain BTC (the digital asset with the highest value storage), using approximately 200,000 tokens held by the government through criminal and civil forfeiture over the years.
The other part includes a digital asset reserve containing assets other than Bitcoin, which may include XRP, ADA, ETH, and SOL (announced by the president last weekend) as well as possibly other assets. The main difference between the reserve and the inventory is that the government will not actively seek to purchase more inventory assets. The government will only explore using government funds (if they can find a budget-neutral way to do so) to purchase BTC. The Treasury Secretary can determine responsible management strategies, including assets that may be sold from the U.S. digital asset inventory.
In a recent Bloomberg interview with David Sacks, the crypto mogul responded to the question of whether "ADA, SOL, XRP will be included in the U.S. cryptocurrency reserve, and why the president mentioned them?" by saying, "Well, the president mentioned the top five cryptocurrencies by market cap. So I think people are reading too much into this. He just mentioned the top five that we actually hold."
He emphasized, "Again, we need to do an accounting (referring to the U.S. starting to audit its existing cryptocurrency holdings). Today, we are not sure whether the federal government owns these other altcoins; we know the government owns Bitcoin. I believe the government also owns some Ethereum. As for the others, I'm not too sure. That's why we need to do an accounting. Frankly, no one has been able to provide a clear answer about what assets the federal government owns. The reason for this issue is that we have not had a cryptocurrency strategy before this. That's why we missed the opportunity to accumulate significant value for the American people."
Recently, Cardano founder Charles Hoskinson also stated that he was unaware of Trump's plan to include ADA in the strategic reserve. "We know nothing about ADA being included in the strategic reserve; this is news to me. We never knew about this, and no one has ever talked to us about it."
This indicates that the concepts of a cryptocurrency strategic reserve and cryptocurrency asset inventory within the U.S. government may still be at a stage of undeveloped policy ideas and public declarations. The government's actual holdings of these altcoins, management strategies, and even whether they will be included in the strategic reserve itself lack clear official accounting and regulatory planning. The claim that the government holds the top five market cap assets seems more like a vague public statement and may just be a mention in political discourse.
In this process, the Trump administration aims to send a strong signal that it is seriously building a cryptocurrency reserve system to showcase its pro-crypto stance; however, it lacks detailed institutional arrangements regarding the current holdings and future purchasing plans. David Sacks also acknowledged that an audit and sorting of the holdings of altcoins is still needed, and the compliance and accounting systems within various government departments, as well as between federal and state levels, are not adequately prepared to accept such assets. This has led to an awkward situation where the government publicly claims to be laying out a strategy for cryptocurrency assets, while the market finds that relevant information lacks substantial transparency, with even project founders unaware of being included in the reserves. As a result, SOL briefly dropped by 9%, reaching a low of around $137, while ADA and XRP both fell by about 7%.
Additionally, according to Decrypt, David Sacks stated in an interview that Trump's personal cryptocurrency projects (such as the controversial meme coin) are "unrelated" to government policy. When asked whether Trump's cryptocurrency projects affect industry regulation, he said, "I don't think it has any impact; it has nothing to do with the work we are doing here."
When asked about Trump's "personal investment" in cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin, David Sacks stated, "These are unsubstantiated facts."
Summary
The current state of U.S. cryptocurrency regulation is in a delicate phase where there is an urgent need for a leading posture externally, while internally, political maneuvering prevents a clear consensus from being reached. This creates a significant contrast between the grandiose statements made at this summit and the substantive policy implementation. If the government continues to treat cryptocurrency policy as a political tool in this manner, rather than genuinely coordinating with the industry, regulatory bodies, and Congress, the "big noise but little rain" scenario is likely to continue, and the long-term stable and compliant policy dividends that can truly benefit the industry will remain elusive.
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
