Repeatedly frozen cards that go unaddressed are often the main reason for being targeted when selling coins!
The cryptocurrency trading industry is not inherently highly profitable, but many have turned it into a lucrative venture. However, as profits increase, so do the risks, and the short-sighted approach of focusing solely on profits without considering risks has led many to be targeted.
Three years ago, there was a saying in the industry: "Profit covers all."
This means using profits to cover all costs, including risks. Three years of bloodshed and profits without losses.
Many people imitate others, thinking they can succeed after just a few days of learning. For example, a cryptocurrency trader named Diyi has been in the business for several years and has opened many companies. Some peers pretend to be novices to join as employees and learn the trade. After a month, they return to build their own teams. Last month, 17 people from one company were taken down, and even their girlfriends came to find me.
This is a typical case of learning only the surface without grasping the essence.
Whether you are a trader or a retail investor, the main reason for being targeted is often due to frozen cards. In fact, occasional frozen cards are not a big deal; you can handle them yourself. However, the root cause of a complete collapse is usually related to major criminal cases. In such cases, the premise is that there is no issue, but after two or three years, it becomes a social news scandal.
These major cases must be handled reasonably and legally, with the correct procedures followed.
Many people will defend themselves by saying: "I was just trading coins, using collateral on exchanges, and there was KYC verification. We don’t know what the other party did with the coins."
Do you really not know?
Did you conduct risk control? Was it over-the-counter trading? Was it cash trading? Were the transaction prices abnormal? Was the communication conducted on legitimate software? These factors are not important.
What matters is providing evidence of ignorance, and most people cannot provide this evidence. Judges will see from your transaction history that you conducted small tests before trading, that every card had trial transactions, and that every quick in-and-out transaction will increase your potential sentence.
Your past behavior of having multiple frozen cards that went unaddressed will be deemed as knowingly involved with illicit funds. Most traders are convicted this way.
I can tell you clearly that anyone sentenced for selling coins must have had experiences with frozen cards, which leads to the presumption of knowledge.
When you are a trader and have previously experienced frozen cards, and you are still engaged in this industry, when you encounter a case later, you will definitely be targeted. How can you break this presumption of knowledge?
Our known conditions are:
- You have previously had frozen cards that went unaddressed or were unfrozen after expiration.
- You may still be involved in the trading industry, and retail investors may still sell coins.
Therefore, if you have frozen cards that went unaddressed, it is definitely a hidden danger, and you need to eliminate this danger.
How to eliminate the danger?
Traders (retail investors) must address frozen cards immediately after selling USDT and obtain a non-involvement certificate. From a short-term perspective, this resolves the issue of frozen cards, but from a long-term perspective, a non-involvement certificate provides evidence of ignorance regarding potential concealment or complicity in crimes. If you claim ignorance, the judge will ask why you had so many frozen cards.
As long as you can present a non-involvement certificate, it shows that you are indeed not involved. At the very least, the judge cannot definitively evaluate whether you knew the funds were illicit based on the frozen cards!
I truly did not know! I had frozen cards in the past, but I handled them, and the relevant authorities have provided me with proof of non-involvement and non-fraud. On what basis can you say I knew?
We common people certainly believe in the authorities; they have already told me I am not involved, so I will continue to operate. If the authorities told me I was involved, I would definitely stop.
As for other situations that imply knowledge, such as whether risk control was conducted, whether it was over-the-counter trading, whether it was cash trading, whether the transaction prices were abnormal, and whether the communication was conducted on legitimate software, everyone is aware of these techniques.
If you do not have these preparations, then you are not a qualified trader. If you are a retail investor, you need to consider how to secure your funds. Just because you haven't had frozen cards doesn't mean your funds will be safe in three to five years. You must be able to trace the source and destination of the funds to ensure security.
Before selling coins at any OTC merchant, you will definitely be put on a blacklist.
免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。
