A regulatory shift is redefining how crypto assets are treated under U.S. securities law, as federal authorities outline when digital tokens fall within investment contract rules. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), alongside guidance from the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC), on March 17, 2026, detailed both the classification of crypto assets and the conditions that trigger securities treatment.

Central to the framework is a clear threshold for when a non-security crypto asset becomes regulated as a security. The SEC stated:

“A non-security crypto asset becomes subject to an investment contract when an issuer offers it by inducing an investment of money in a common enterprise with representations or promises to undertake essential managerial efforts from which a purchaser would reasonably expect to derive profits.”

An investment contract, in this context, refers to an arrangement where individuals commit value into a shared venture with the expectation that returns come primarily from the efforts of others, making it a core test for determining whether a transaction falls under securities law.

This concept determines whether something is legally treated as a security. Federal securities laws apply not only to traditional instruments like stocks, but also to arrangements that function as investments under this definition. A crypto asset may fall within regulatory scope if it is marketed in a way that creates reliance on an issuer’s managerial efforts to generate profit. The CFTC noted it will administer the Commodity Exchange Act consistently with this interpretation, especially for non-security crypto assets that may qualify as commodities.

The framework also introduces a structured taxonomy for the market. It states: “For purposes of this release, we classify crypto assets into five categories based on their characteristics, uses, and functions: (i) digital commodities; (ii) digital collectibles; (iii) digital tools; (iv) stablecoins; and (v) digital securities.” These categories reflect how assets derive value, whether through network use, cultural demand, functional roles, price stability, or financial rights.

Classification alone does not dictate regulatory treatment. Digital commodities, collectibles, and tools generally fall outside securities laws because they do not involve profit expectations tied to managerial efforts. Stablecoins may or may not qualify depending on structure, while digital securities fall within the regulatory perimeter. The deciding factor remains whether an issuer creates an investment contract through promises that shape investor expectations.

The SEC’s approach allows a crypto asset’s regulatory status to change over time. If issuer commitments drive expectations of profit, the asset may be linked to a securities transaction. If those commitments are fulfilled or no longer relevant, that link can dissolve. This framework, coordinated with the CFTC, centers on economic reality and investor reliance rather than the technical form of the asset.

• When does a crypto asset become a security under SEC rules?
  When investor expectations depend on issuer-led managerial efforts tied to profit.
• How does the SEC classify different types of crypto assets?
  It uses five categories: commodities, collectibles, tools, stablecoins, and securities.
• Can a crypto asset’s regulatory status change over time?
  Yes, it can shift based on evolving issuer commitments and investor expectations.
• What role does the CFTC play in this framework?
  It applies consistent treatment for crypto assets qualifying as commodities.

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。