On April 4, 2026, Solana co-founder Toly responded on X to Helius CEO Mert regarding the discussion about "the next round of the crypto cycle is coming," pulling the focus of the debate back from price and sentiment to the financial infrastructure itself. He did not join in on the bull market shout but instead threw out a more lethal judgment: "Cheaper, faster, and lower-risk financial methods will prevail over all alternatives." The crypto world often talks about "cycles," but this time the core of the controversy centered on a more essential question—what kind of technology should support mainstream finance in the future to genuinely realize "faster, cheaper, and safer," rather than just stopping at a series of market narratives.

From market fluctuations to the spark of cycle predictions

At the beginning of April 2026, Eastern Time, the crypto market gradually entered a high-level consolidation and adjustment period following a previous period of severe volatility: price pulls weakened, leverage cooled, trading volume fell, and the market appeared to be waiting for the next clear narrative. It was precisely in this vacuum phase, where neither price rises nor falls could be clearly justified, that the debate about whether "the next cycle is already on its way" re-emerged.

Helius CEO Mert stated on social media that a new round of crypto cycles is approaching, pointing to mid- to long-term opportunities brought about by infrastructure evolution and application innovation, rather than just a simple price rebound. Although the briefing did not provide the original tweet, it can be confirmed that his core attitude is: the new cycle is more like a result of technological and structural upgrades, rather than a spontaneous celebration of sentiment.

Toly chose to publicly respond to this discussion on April 4, which itself was interpreted as a signal by the market. He did not follow the sentiment of "the bull market is back," but instead, with the judgment that "cheaper, faster, and lower-risk finance will ultimately prevail," drew boundaries around the so-called "next cycle": if the infrastructure cannot support this leap in efficiency, then cycles built solely on asset prices and narratives will be nothing but fleeting. For funds and developers betting on the Solana narrative, this response feels more like a declaration—whoever can articulate the main narrative of financial infrastructure in the next round will be qualified to discuss cycles.

Toly's bet: Who can make finance "cheaper, faster, and safer"

In his response, Toly’s core judgment is very sharp: "Cheaper, faster, and lower-risk financial methods will prevail over all alternatives." The term "alternatives" here refers not only to other public chains or crypto products but also to the entire existing system centered around traditional finance. This is not an abstract slogan, but an almost engineering-like decision rule—whoever excels in cost, speed, and risk across these three dimensions will ultimately survive.

In contrast, traditional finance has structural disadvantages on all three points. On the cost side, layers of intermediaries, complex compliance, and operational systems drive up fees that are passed on to users and institutions, from hefty cross-border remittance fees to hidden costs in small payments. On the speed side, transactions from matchmaking to clearing and settlement often take T+1, T+2 days, and cross-border transactions tend to follow a "business day" rhythm, failing to meet the real-time demands of the internet age. In terms of risk control, the seemingly robust risk management and regulatory safety nets rely on highly centralized institutional judgments, and once there is misalignment of internal incentives or management errors, risks can accumulate to uncontrollable levels in a black box.

Toly's judgment implicitly sets a “qualifying line” for crypto infrastructure and applications. To gain survival space in the next phase, public chains and protocols must not only be "slightly faster and slightly cheaper" on paper than the traditional system but must differentiate themselves by orders of magnitude:

● In terms of cost, on-chain transaction fees need to be low enough to support high-frequency, fragmented micropayments and complex combination trades, rather than allowing fees themselves to become a barrier to use.

● In terms of speed, confirmations and settlements need to be close to real time to support highly latency-sensitive businesses, such as derivatives, order books, and global payment networks.

● In terms of risk, through verifiable rules and code, the "unexpected losses" must be reduced to levels that traditional systems find hard to reach, rather than simply relying on human safety nets.

In other words, Toly's bet actually sets a standard for the next round of infrastructure competition: any technological path that does not satisfy the "cheaper, faster, and safer" criteria is just a temporary transition.

Immutable code: the foundational contract of new finance

To support this judgment, Toly particularly emphasized the fundamental role of "immutable, formally verified software" in reducing financial risks. In his narrative, this kind of software is no longer just "a program written more rigorously," but the foundational contract of the new financial system—a set of rules that can be independently verified and is difficult to arbitrarily modify. Formal verification means that key logic can be checked by mathematical tools, avoiding exposure to fatal flaws under extreme market conditions, thereby transforming "black swan" events into more controllable probabilities.

Combined with on-chain governance and security mechanisms, Toly mentioned that administrator keys must be bound by immutable strategies, a typical approach being contract-level constraints such as time locks. Time locks require administrators to undergo a public waiting window when modifying key parameters or upgrading contracts, allowing on-chain participants to review, raise alerts, or even exit during that period, thereby preventing catastrophic operations like "midnight rule changes" or "instant liquidity withdrawals." Administrator privileges are no longer absolute powers but are encoded within predictable rules.

Behind this is a shift from a trust structure that relies on "trusting people" to "trusting code." Traditional finance relies on licenses, institutional brands, and individual reputations, where users largely hand over their assets to an entire system governed by human rule; whereas in the new finance envisioned by Toly, what truly deserves trust is publicly auditable code and strategies. People still exist, but are confined within strict and transparent boundaries of authority. Once the market gradually accepts this trust paradigm, so-called "lower-risk finance" will no longer be a verbal promise but something that can be quantified and verified directly on-chain through design and verification tools.

Solana’s speed and cost: a coherence between narrative and technology

In this context, Solana's technological path aligns closely with Toly's views. As a high-performance public chain, Solana focuses on high throughput, low latency, and low fees: it pursues high TPS and rapid confirmation times in design, enabling on-chain interactions to approach internet-level experiences, with transaction fees compressed to a level sufficient to support high-frequency, low-value operations. Although the briefing did not provide detailed technical metrics, "fast transactions and low costs" have become fixed labels in Solana's narrative.

Putting these features into specific scenarios makes it easier to understand what "cheaper and faster" means. For example, a mobile payment application with a global user base, if it needs to settle on-chain, requires instant confirmation for every scan or online payment, and fees low enough to be negligible; otherwise, any slight friction will escalate into catastrophic costs at scale. Similarly, a high-frequency trading or on-chain order book system is far more sensitive to delays and bandwidth than ordinary DeFi; if a public chain cannot complete matchmaking and settlement in milliseconds to seconds, discussing strategy trading becomes nearly impossible. Solana's performance design reserves space for such high-concurrency, high-interaction financial scenarios.

In the narrative battle for the "next round of cycles," high-performance public chains are competing for the discourse power of infrastructure: if larger-scale financial activities migrate on-chain in the future, the chain capable of accommodating them qualifies to define standards and allocate profits. Toly's response, "cheaper, faster, and safer finance will undoubtedly prevail," is not only an expression of ideology but also a reminder to the market: whoever can embed these three points into the foundational architecture may dominate the narrative in the new cycle. For Solana, this is both a declaration of confidence and a public bet on the technical answers it has delivered.

Traditional finance's moat and the gaps under attack

Compared to on-chain finance, the moat of traditional finance mainly comes from regulatory systems, safety nets, and brand credibility. Licensed institutions provide users with a sense of security—"someone will absorb the losses even if something goes wrong"—through mechanisms like deposit insurance, central bank liquidity support, and strict capital requirements; this sense of security is hard for ordinary users to replace. At the same time, the brand and channel advantages accumulated by large banks and payment institutions give them a natural edge in customer acquisition and compliance resources.

However, beneath the moat, gaps are continually being attacked by new technologies. High fees and prolonged arrival times in cross-border transfers, capital occupation and complex reconciliation in clearing cycles, and invisible yet pervasive hidden costs in retail finance are all pain points that users are willing to endure but are not satisfied with. For the internet generation, accustomed to real-time communication and streaming services, completing a fund transfer in days feels like a cognitive imbalance.

On the other hand, regulatory and compliance uncertainties become key external variables that either accelerate or forcefully slow down the penetration speed of on-chain finance. Once a particular jurisdiction provides a clear, stable, and predictable regulatory framework for on-chain assets and agreements, new financial tools will have the opportunity to engage in "surgical" replacements of high-cost, high-friction aspects of traditional systems without colliding directly with regulations; conversely, if the regulatory environment remains indecisive for long periods or adopts a "one-size-fits-all" approach to new technologies, on-chain finance may be forced to linger in gray areas, unable to bridge with the scale of mainstream finance.

Toly’s emphasis on "immutable, formally verified software" and administrator keys constrained by mechanisms like time locks is essentially a response to regulatory concerns: by using auditable code and rules to bring risk exposure and governance processes to the forefront on-chain, they offer a middle ground that allows for both innovation and regulation. In this sense, the relationship between on-chain finance and regulation is not simply antagonistic; rather, it resembles two orders renegotiating boundaries.

The next round of cycles: from price euphoria to infrastructure competition

Returning to the seemingly simple response on April 4, perhaps what is truly worth recording is not the excitement of "the next round of the crypto cycle is coming," but Toly's deliberate shifting of the topic from price back to infrastructure. When industry leaders, while the market is still unclear, prefer to talk about cold engineering metrics such as "cost, speed, and risk," rather than joining in on the shout for a bull market, this itself marks a narrative upgrade.

If the last round of cycles was still highly dependent on speculative sentiment and liquidity flooding, the upcoming competition is more likely to be driven by a combination of "performance + security": which chain can still maintain extremely low fees and stable operation under real high-concurrency environments; which protocol can still lock risks within acceptable ranges using formal verification and on-chain governance in the face of complex attacks. Those solutions that look good on paper but cannot withstand stress tests will be ruthlessly filtered out during the next severe volatility.

What truly deserves attention is no longer "who shouts the loudest about the cycle," but rather three specific observable things:

● Whether real financial scenarios have truly migrated on-chain—how many are beginning to operate on public chains in a scalable and sustainable manner, from cross-border settlements, trading infrastructure to daily payments.

● The extent of the adoption of immutable agreements—how many key financial operations have shifted from "relying on human credibility and judgment" to "relying on verifiable code and on-chain strategies," especially whether constraints on administrative powers have become industry consensus.

● The positioning of high-performance public chains within regulatory and compliance frameworks—which infrastructures can find stable footholds across different jurisdictions, thus bridging the flow and asset migration between mainstream finance and the on-chain world.

When these questions begin to have clear answers, the idea of "why cheaper and faster finance must win" will no longer be just a viewpoint in tweets, but will transform into facts written through daily transactions and fund flows.

Join our community to discuss and get stronger together!
Official Telegram community: https://t.me/aicoincn
AiCoin Chinese Twitter: https://x.com/AiCoinzh

OKX benefits group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=l61eM4owQ
Binance benefits group: https://aicoin.com/link/chat?cid=ynr7d1P6Z

免责声明：本文章仅代表作者个人观点，不代表本平台的立场和观点。本文章仅供信息分享，不构成对任何人的任何投资建议。用户与作者之间的任何争议，与本平台无关。如网页中刊载的文章或图片涉及侵权，请提供相关的权利证明和身份证明发送邮件到support@aicoin.com，本平台相关工作人员将会进行核查。